Improve offline slashing calculation (#1371)

* srml: apply slashing for all offline reports at once

* srml: add regression test for slashing overflow
This commit is contained in:
André Silva
2019-01-10 15:03:15 +00:00
committed by Robert Habermeier
parent a13fda2e83
commit 3555ef425d
2 changed files with 89 additions and 37 deletions
+50 -37
View File
@@ -508,55 +508,68 @@ impl<T: Trait> Module<T> {
/// Call when a validator is determined to be offline. `count` is the
/// number of offences the validator has committed.
pub fn on_offline_validator(v: T::AccountId, count: usize) {
use primitives::traits::CheckedShl;
use primitives::traits::{CheckedAdd, CheckedShl};
// Early exit if validator is invulnerable.
if Self::invulnerables().contains(&v) {
return
}
for _ in 0..count {
let slash_count = Self::slash_count(&v);
<SlashCount<T>>::insert(v.clone(), slash_count + 1);
let grace = Self::offline_slash_grace();
let slash_count = Self::slash_count(&v);
let new_slash_count = slash_count + count as u32;
<SlashCount<T>>::insert(v.clone(), new_slash_count);
let grace = Self::offline_slash_grace();
let event = if slash_count >= grace {
let event = if new_slash_count > grace {
let slash = {
let base_slash = Self::current_offline_slash();
let instances = slash_count - grace;
let base_slash = Self::current_offline_slash();
let slash = match base_slash.checked_shl(instances) {
Some(slash) => slash,
None => {
// freeze at last maximum valid slash if this starts
// to overflow.
<SlashCount<T>>::insert(v.clone(), slash_count);
base_slash.checked_shl(instances - 1)
.expect("slash count no longer incremented after overflow; \
prior check only fails with instances >= 1; \
thus instances - 1 always works and is a valid amount of bits; qed")
let mut total_slash = T::Balance::default();
for i in instances..(instances + count as u32) {
if let Some(total) = base_slash.checked_shl(i)
.and_then(|slash| total_slash.checked_add(&slash)) {
total_slash = total;
} else {
// reset slash count only up to the current
// instance. the total slash overflows the unit for
// balance in the system therefore we can slash all
// the slashable balance for the account
<SlashCount<T>>::insert(v.clone(), slash_count + i);
total_slash = Self::slashable_balance(&v);
break;
}
};
let next_slash = slash << 1;
let _ = Self::slash_validator(&v, slash);
if instances >= Self::validator_preferences(&v).unstake_threshold
|| Self::slashable_balance(&v) < next_slash
{
if let Some(pos) = Self::intentions().into_iter().position(|x| &x == &v) {
Self::apply_unstake(&v, pos)
.expect("pos derived correctly from Self::intentions(); \
apply_unstake can only fail if pos wrong; \
Self::intentions() doesn't change; qed");
}
let _ = Self::apply_force_new_era(false);
}
RawEvent::OfflineSlash(v.clone(), slash)
} else {
RawEvent::OfflineWarning(v.clone(), slash_count)
total_slash
};
Self::deposit_event(event);
}
let _ = Self::slash_validator(&v, slash);
let next_slash = match slash.checked_shl(1) {
Some(slash) => slash,
None => Self::slashable_balance(&v),
};
let instances = new_slash_count - grace;
if instances > Self::validator_preferences(&v).unstake_threshold
|| Self::slashable_balance(&v) < next_slash
|| next_slash <= slash
{
if let Some(pos) = Self::intentions().into_iter().position(|x| &x == &v) {
Self::apply_unstake(&v, pos)
.expect("pos derived correctly from Self::intentions(); \
apply_unstake can only fail if pos wrong; \
Self::intentions() doesn't change; qed");
}
let _ = Self::apply_force_new_era(false);
}
RawEvent::OfflineSlash(v.clone(), slash)
} else {
RawEvent::OfflineWarning(v.clone(), slash_count)
};
Self::deposit_event(event);
}
}
+39
View File
@@ -557,3 +557,42 @@ fn slash_value_calculation_does_not_overflow() {
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 100);
});
}
#[test]
fn next_slash_value_calculation_does_not_overflow() {
with_externalities(&mut new_test_ext(0, 3, 3, 0, true, 10), || {
assert_eq!(Staking::era_length(), 9);
assert_eq!(Staking::sessions_per_era(), 3);
assert_eq!(Staking::last_era_length_change(), 0);
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
assert_eq!(Staking::intentions(), vec![10, 20]);
assert_eq!(Staking::offline_slash_grace(), 0);
// set validator preferences so the validator doesn't back down after
// slashing.
<ValidatorPreferences<Test>>::insert(10, ValidatorPrefs {
unstake_threshold: u32::max_value(),
validator_payment: 0,
});
// we have enough balance to cover the last slash before overflow
Balances::set_free_balance(&10, u64::max_value());
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), u64::max_value());
// the balance type is u64, so after slashing 64 times,
// the slash value should have overflowed. add a couple extra for
// good measure with the slash grace.
trait TypeEq {}
impl<A> TypeEq for (A, A) {}
fn assert_type_eq<A: TypeEq>() {}
assert_type_eq::<(u64, <Test as balances::Trait>::Balance)>();
// the total slash value should overflow the balance type
// therefore the total validator balance should be slashed
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 100);
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 0);
});
}