mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-06-09 19:01:08 +00:00
srml-staking: Force minimum bond amount + proper cleanup. (#3048)
* enforce minimum bond amount. * Bump. * Improve doc. * Update srml/staking/src/lib.rs Co-Authored-By: Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> * Update srml/staking/src/lib.rs Co-Authored-By: Gavin Wood <gavin@parity.io> * Doc update.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ pub const VERSION: RuntimeVersion = RuntimeVersion {
|
||||
// and set impl_version to equal spec_version. If only runtime
|
||||
// implementation changes and behavior does not, then leave spec_version as
|
||||
// is and increment impl_version.
|
||||
spec_version: 108,
|
||||
impl_version: 108,
|
||||
spec_version: 109,
|
||||
impl_version: 109,
|
||||
apis: RUNTIME_API_VERSIONS,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -653,6 +653,8 @@ decl_module! {
|
||||
/// Take the origin account as a stash and lock up `value` of its balance. `controller` will
|
||||
/// be the account that controls it.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// `value` must be more than the `existential_deposit` defined in the Balances module.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The dispatch origin for this call must be _Signed_ by the stash account.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # <weight>
|
||||
@@ -662,10 +664,6 @@ decl_module! {
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// NOTE: Two of the storage writes (`Self::bonded`, `Self::payee`) are _never_ cleaned unless
|
||||
/// the `origin` falls below _existential deposit_ and gets removed as dust.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// NOTE: At the moment, there are no financial restrictions to bond
|
||||
/// (which creates a bunch of storage items for an account). In essence, nothing prevents many accounts from
|
||||
/// spamming `Staking` storage by bonding 1 UNIT. See test case: `bond_with_no_staked_value`.
|
||||
/// # </weight>
|
||||
fn bond(origin,
|
||||
controller: <T::Lookup as StaticLookup>::Source,
|
||||
@@ -684,6 +682,11 @@ decl_module! {
|
||||
return Err("controller already paired")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// reject a bond which is considered to be _dust_.
|
||||
if value < T::Currency::minimum_balance() {
|
||||
return Err("can not bond with value less than minimum balance")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// You're auto-bonded forever, here. We might improve this by only bonding when
|
||||
// you actually validate/nominate and remove once you unbond __everything__.
|
||||
<Bonded<T>>::insert(&stash, controller.clone());
|
||||
@@ -699,6 +702,8 @@ decl_module! {
|
||||
/// for staking.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Use this if there are additional funds in your stash account that you wish to bond.
|
||||
/// Unlike [`bond`] or [`unbond`] this function does not impose any limitation on the amount
|
||||
/// that can be added.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The dispatch origin for this call must be _Signed_ by the stash, not the controller.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@@ -781,9 +786,9 @@ decl_module! {
|
||||
/// See also [`Call::unbond`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # <weight>
|
||||
/// - Could be dependent on the `origin` argument and how much `unlocking` chunks exist. It implies
|
||||
/// `consolidate_unlocked` which loops over `Ledger.unlocking`, which is indirectly
|
||||
/// user-controlled. See [`unbond`] for more detail.
|
||||
/// - Could be dependent on the `origin` argument and how much `unlocking` chunks exist.
|
||||
/// It implies `consolidate_unlocked` which loops over `Ledger.unlocking`, which is
|
||||
/// indirectly user-controlled. See [`unbond`] for more detail.
|
||||
/// - Contains a limited number of reads, yet the size of which could be large based on `ledger`.
|
||||
/// - Writes are limited to the `origin` account key.
|
||||
/// # </weight>
|
||||
@@ -791,7 +796,20 @@ decl_module! {
|
||||
let controller = ensure_signed(origin)?;
|
||||
let ledger = Self::ledger(&controller).ok_or("not a controller")?;
|
||||
let ledger = ledger.consolidate_unlocked(Self::current_era());
|
||||
Self::update_ledger(&controller, &ledger);
|
||||
|
||||
if ledger.unlocking.is_empty() && ledger.active.is_zero() {
|
||||
// This account must have called `unbond()` with some value that caused the active
|
||||
// portion to fall below existential deposit + will have no more unlocking chunks
|
||||
// left. We can now safely remove this.
|
||||
let stash = ledger.stash;
|
||||
// remove the lock.
|
||||
T::Currency::remove_lock(STAKING_ID, &stash);
|
||||
// remove all staking-related information.
|
||||
Self::kill_stash(&stash);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// This was the consequence of a partial unbond. just update the ledger and move on.
|
||||
Self::update_ledger(&controller, &ledger);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Declare the desire to validate for the origin controller.
|
||||
@@ -1241,6 +1259,21 @@ impl<T: Trait> Module<T> {
|
||||
ForceNewEra::put(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Remove all associated data of a stash account from the staking system.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is called :
|
||||
/// - Immediately when an account's balance falls below existential deposit.
|
||||
/// - after a `withdraw_unbond()` call that frees all of a stash's bonded balance.
|
||||
fn kill_stash(stash: &T::AccountId) {
|
||||
if let Some(controller) = <Bonded<T>>::take(stash) {
|
||||
<Ledger<T>>::remove(&controller);
|
||||
}
|
||||
<Payee<T>>::remove(stash);
|
||||
<SlashCount<T>>::remove(stash);
|
||||
<Validators<T>>::remove(stash);
|
||||
<Nominators<T>>::remove(stash);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Call when a validator is determined to be offline. `count` is the
|
||||
/// number of offenses the validator has committed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@@ -1315,13 +1348,7 @@ impl<T: Trait> OnSessionEnding<T::AccountId, Exposure<T::AccountId, BalanceOf<T>
|
||||
|
||||
impl<T: Trait> OnFreeBalanceZero<T::AccountId> for Module<T> {
|
||||
fn on_free_balance_zero(stash: &T::AccountId) {
|
||||
if let Some(controller) = <Bonded<T>>::take(stash) {
|
||||
<Ledger<T>>::remove(&controller);
|
||||
}
|
||||
<Payee<T>>::remove(stash);
|
||||
<SlashCount<T>>::remove(stash);
|
||||
<Validators<T>>::remove(stash);
|
||||
<Nominators<T>>::remove(stash);
|
||||
Self::kill_stash(stash);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1714,59 +1714,46 @@ fn bond_with_no_staked_value() {
|
||||
// Particularly when she votes and the candidate is elected.
|
||||
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.validator_count(3)
|
||||
.existential_deposit(5)
|
||||
.nominate(false)
|
||||
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
||||
.build(), || {
|
||||
// setup
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
||||
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&3, 1000);
|
||||
let initial_balance_2 = Balances::free_balance(&2);
|
||||
let initial_balance_4 = Balances::free_balance(&4);
|
||||
// Can't bond with 1
|
||||
assert_noop!(
|
||||
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller),
|
||||
"can not bond with value less than minimum balance"
|
||||
);
|
||||
// bonded with absolute minimum value possible.
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 5, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
||||
|
||||
// Stingy validator.
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
||||
// unbonding even 1 will cause all to be unbonded.
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(2), 1));
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Staking::ledger(2),
|
||||
Some(StakingLedger {
|
||||
stash: 1,
|
||||
active: 0,
|
||||
total: 5,
|
||||
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk {value: 5, era: 3}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
||||
|
||||
// min of 10, 20 and 30 (30 got a payout into staking so it raised it from 1 to 31).
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 31);
|
||||
|
||||
// make the stingy one elected.
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![1]));
|
||||
|
||||
// no rewards paid to 2 and 4 yet
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), initial_balance_2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&4), initial_balance_4);
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Stingy one is selected
|
||||
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(1), Exposure {
|
||||
own: 1,
|
||||
total: 501,
|
||||
others: vec![IndividualExposure { who: 3, value: 500}],
|
||||
});
|
||||
// New slot stake.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 501);
|
||||
|
||||
// no rewards paid to 2 and 4 yet
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), initial_balance_2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&4), initial_balance_4);
|
||||
// not yet removed.
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(2)));
|
||||
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_some());
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(3);
|
||||
|
||||
// Approximation resulting from Perbill conversion
|
||||
let approximation = 1;
|
||||
let reward = Staking::current_session_reward() * 3;
|
||||
// 2 will not get a reward of only 1
|
||||
// 4 will get the rest
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), initial_balance_2 + 3 - approximation);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&4), initial_balance_4 + reward - 3 - approximation);
|
||||
// poof. Account 1 is removed from the staking system.
|
||||
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(2)));
|
||||
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_none());
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1).len(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user