The validators are checking if async backing is enabled by checking the
version of the runtime api. If the runtime api is upgraded by a runtime
upgrade, the validators start to also enable the async backing logic.
However, just because async backing is enabled, it doesn't mean that all
collators and parachain runtimes have upgraded. This pull request fixes
an issue about advertising collations to the relay chain when it has
async backing enabled, but the collator is still using the old
networking protocol. The implementation is actually backwards compatible
as we can not expect that everyone directly upgrades. However, the
collation advertisement logic was requiring V2 networking messages after
async backing was enabled, which was wrong. This is now fixed by this
pull request.
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1923
---------
Co-authored-by: eskimor <eskimor@users.noreply.github.com>
Changes:
- Use a sensible limit for the overweight-cutoff of a single messages
instead of the full configured `ServiceWeight`.
- Add/Update tests
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
`cargo install` takes a long time in CI. We want to run it relatively
frequently without chewing through so much compute (see
https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/771) so I added automatic
binary releases to the try-runtime-cli repo.
A small added benefit is we can use it in our existing
`on-runtime-upgrade` checks, which should cut their execution time by
about half.
closes: https://github.com/paritytech/devops/issues/2090
## Changes
1. Updated the list of bootnodes.
2. Merged the Connect node and bootnode into a single node.
3. Decreased the number of nodes.
4. Updated the DNS name.
## Description
The initial 8 bootnodes were planned to be replaced by community
bootnodes, the community node was added but we did not bother to reduce
the Parity managed bootnodes. Fixing it now.
Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR
paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433.
This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the
`FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the
XCM config for all runtimes.
The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a
specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured
as the treasury account.
XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin
is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating
chain).
# Note for reviewers
Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the
new fees.
Main changes are in:
- cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery
fees exponential factor
- polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the
FeeManager implementation
- All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM
configuration
# Important note
After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*,
Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport,
DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock)
will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to
pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be
sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This
delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in
pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees!
Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the
formula:
```
delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee)
```
where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding
pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges),
the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message
itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee
for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`).
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <gilescope@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
Upgraded to version 2.1.0 which has paritytech/review-bot#94, a change
in the logic of the action to overcome some problems with permissions
coming from PRs from forks
For this, we needed to divide the actions into two files:
- A first action that triggers on PRs and reviews and uploads the PR
number.
- A second action which is triggered under the completion of the first
one and runs as the action normally runs (but won't have any problems
regarding permissions because it is triggered from the master branch)
I have added some Traits that are missing and are useful for dealing
with non-fungible tokens on other pallets and their implementations for
NFTs pallet.
- In the Mutate trait, added methods for dealing with the metadata:
`set_metadata`, `set_collection_metadata`, `clear_metadata` and
`clear_collection_metadata`.
The motivation of adding this methods coming from a StackExchange
question asking for it: [Setting metadata of an item of the Nfts pallet
in a custom
pallet](https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/9974/setting-metadata-of-an-item-of-the-nfts-pallet-in-a-custom-pallet)
- A Trait for trading non-fungible items. The methods in that Trait are
`buy_item`, `set_price` and `item_price`
An example of where this Trait can be useful is a pallet that deals with
[NFT
Royalties](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/nfts-royalty-pallet/3766)
and needs to perform this actions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jegor Sidorenko <5252494+jsidorenko@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds Rococo Asset Hub dedicated runtime so we can test new
features here, before merging them in Kusama Asset Hub.
Also adds one such feature: asset transfer over bridge (Rococo AssetHub
<> Wococo AssetHub)
- clone `asset-hub-kusama-runtime` -> `asset-hub-rococo-runtime`
- make it use Rococo primitives, names, assets, constants, etc
- add asset-transfer-over-bridge support to Rococo AssetHub <> Wococo
AssetHub
Fixes#1128
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1916
Changes:
- Trivially wrap the migration into a version migration to enforce
idempotency.
- Opinionated logging nits
@liamaharon maybe we can add a check to the `try-runtime-cli` that
migrations are idempotent? It should be possible to check that the
storage root is identical after executing a second time (and that it
does not panic like it did here 😆).
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR introduces several enhancements.
The current implementation of `NetworkExportTable` lacks remote location
filtering support beyond `NetworkId` lookup. To provide more control and
granularity, it's essential to allow configuration for bridging to
different consensus `NetworkId` while restricting access e.g. to
particular remote parachains.
Additionally, the `StartsWith` and `Equals` and
`StartsWithExplicitGlobalConsensus` helper functions, which are in
active use, are moved to the `xcm-builder` and `frame_support` modules
for better code organization.
Adds a new `LocationWithAssetFilters` filter to enable location-based
and asset-related filtering. This filter is useful for configuring the
`pallet_xcm` filter for
[XcmTeleportFilter](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm/src/lib.rs#L212)
and
[XcmReserveTransferFilter](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm/src/lib.rs#L216)
to restrict specific assets.
Furthermore, the `BridgeMessage` fields are not accessible outside of
`xcm-builder`, limiting the ability to create custom logic dependent on
it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Fix situation where BEEFY initial validator set could not be determined.
If state is unavailable at BEEFY genesis block to get initial validator
set, get the info from header digests. For this, we need to walk back
the chain starting from BEEFY genesis looking for the BEEFY digest
announcing the active validator set for that respective session.
This commit fixes a silly bug where walking back the chain was stopped
when reaching BEEFY genesis block, which is incorrect when BEEFY genesis
is not session boundary block. When BEEFY genesis is set to some random
block within a session, we need to walk back to the start of the session
to see the validator set announcement.
Added regression test for this fix.
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1885
Signed-off-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Adding link checker to the CI (closes
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/993). It would be nice
to have the docs people own this and extend accordingly.
Currently all known-bad links are excluded, but we should one-by-one
include those as well until all are fixed.
This check now ensures that 1) no new broken links are introduced into
`.rs` files and 2) that no old links break unnoticed.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
# Description
Follow up for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1489.
Closes#611
Before we calculated the channel size during alert expression but in
#1489 a new metric was introduced that reports channel size.
## Changes:
1. updated alert rule to use new metric.
Following
[polkadot#7314](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7314) and
after merging https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1177 this
PR solves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1618
The following is a summary of the outcome of the migration.
| Module | Total Accounts | Total stake to unlock | Total deposit to
unreserve |
| ------- | --------------- | --------------------- |
-------------------------- |
| Elections Phragmen | 27 | 1,132.821063320441 ROC | 1.465386531600 ROC
|
| Democracy | 69 | 2733.923509345613 ROC | 0.166666665000 ROC |
| Tips | 4 | N/A | 0.015099999849 ROC |
The migrations will also remove the following amount of keys
103 Democracy keys 🧹
5 Council keys 🧹
1 TechnicalCommittee keys 🧹
25 PhragmenElection keys 🧹
1 TechnicalMembership keys 🧹
9 Tips keys 🧹
- Removal of Arkworks unit tests. These tests were just testing the
arkworks upstream implementation which should be assumed correct. This
is not the place to test well known dependencies.
- Removal of some over-engineering. We just store the calls to Arkworks
in one file. Per-curve sources are not required.
- Docs formatting
---
I also took the opportunity to bump the `bandersnatch-vrfs` crate
revision internally providing some new shiny stuff.
This PR refactors the staking ledger logic to encapsulate all reads and
mutations of `Ledger`, `Bonded`, `Payee` and stake locks within the
`StakingLedger` struct implementation.
With these changes, all the reads and mutations to the `Ledger`, `Payee`
and `Bonded` storage map should be done through the methods exposed by
StakingLedger to ensure the data and lock consistency of the operations.
The new introduced methods that mutate and read Ledger are:
- `ledger.update()`: inserts/updates a staking ledger in storage;
updates staking locks accordingly (and ledger.bond(), which is synthatic
sugar for ledger.update())
- `ledger.kill()`: removes all Bonded and StakingLedger related data for
a given ledger; updates staking locks accordingly;
`StakingLedger::get(account)`: queries both the `Bonded` and `Ledger`
storages and returns a `Option<StakingLedger>`. The pallet impl exposes
fn ledger(account) as synthatic sugar for `StakingLedger::get(account)`.
Retrieving a ledger with `StakingLedger::get()` can be done by providing
either a stash or controller account. The input must be wrapped in a
`StakingAccount` variant (Stash or Controller) which is treated
accordingly. This simplifies the caller API but will eventually be
deprecated once we completely get rid of the controller account in
staking. However, this refactor will help with the work necessary when
completely removing the controller.
Other goals:
- No logical changes have been introduced in this PR;
- No breaking changes or updates in wallets required;
- No new storage items or need to perform storage migrations;
- Centralise the changes to bonds and ledger updates to simplify the
OnStakingUpdate updates to the target list (related to
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443)
Note: it would be great to prevent or at least raise a warning if
`Ledger<T>`, `Payee<T>` and `Bonded<T>` storage types are accessed
outside the `StakingLedger` implementation. This PR should not get
blocked by that feature, but there's a tracking issue here
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/149
Related and step towards
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443
BEEFY needs two cryptographic keys at the same time. Validators should
sign BEEFY payload using both ECDSA and BLS key. The network will gossip
a payload which contains a valid ECDSA key. The prover nodes aggregate
the BLS keys if aggregation fails to verifies the validator which
provided a valid ECDSA signature but an invalid BLS signature is subject
to slashing.
As such BEEFY session should be initiated with both key. Currently there
is no straight forward way of doing so, beside having a session with
RuntimeApp corresponding to a crypto scheme contains both keys.
This pull request implement a generic paired_crypto scheme as well as
implementing it for (ECDSA, BLS) pair.
---------
Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
Co-authored-by: Robert Hambrock <roberthambrock@gmail.com>
closes#695
Could potentially be helpful to preserving caches when applicable, as
discussed in #685
kusama address: FvpsvV1GQAAbwqX6oyRjemgdKV11QU5bXsMg9xsonD1FLGK
# Description
- What does this PR do?
- link added
- Why are these changes needed?
- improve docs
- How were these changes implemented and what do they affect?
- only concerns docs
closes#622
Pros:
* simpler interface, just functions:
`create_runtime_from_artifact_bytes()` and `execute_artifact()`
Cons:
* extra overhead of constructing executor semantics each time
I could make it a combination of
* `create_runtime_config(params)` (such that we could clone the
constructed semantics)
* `create_runtime(blob, config)`
* `execute_artifact(blob, config, params)`
Not sure if it's worth it though.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Francisco Aguirre