Files
pezkuwi-subxt/substrate/frame/offences/src/tests.rs
T
Dcompoze 002d9260f9 Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808)
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.

**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**

Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:

- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`

Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:

- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`

Let me know if this structure is adequate.

**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~

**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.

~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
2024-03-26 13:57:57 +00:00

248 lines
6.9 KiB
Rust

// This file is part of Substrate.
// Copyright (C) Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
//! Tests for the offences module.
#![cfg(test)]
use super::*;
use crate::mock::{
new_test_ext, offence_reports, with_on_offence_fractions, Offence, Offences, RuntimeEvent,
System, KIND,
};
use frame_system::{EventRecord, Phase};
use sp_runtime::Perbill;
#[test]
fn should_report_an_authority_and_trigger_on_offence() {
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
// given
let time_slot = 42;
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
let offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
// when
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence).unwrap();
// then
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
});
});
}
#[test]
fn should_not_report_the_same_authority_twice_in_the_same_slot() {
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
// given
let time_slot = 42;
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
let offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence.clone()).unwrap();
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
f.clear();
});
// when
// report for the second time
assert_eq!(Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence), Err(OffenceError::DuplicateReport));
// then
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![]);
});
});
}
#[test]
fn should_report_in_different_time_slot() {
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
// given
let time_slot = 42;
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
let mut offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence.clone()).unwrap();
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
f.clear();
});
// when
// report for the second time
offence.time_slot += 1;
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence).unwrap();
// then
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
});
});
}
#[test]
fn should_deposit_event() {
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
// given
let time_slot = 42;
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
let offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
// when
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence).unwrap();
// then
assert_eq!(
System::events(),
vec![EventRecord {
phase: Phase::Initialization,
event: RuntimeEvent::Offences(crate::Event::Offence {
kind: KIND,
timeslot: time_slot.encode()
}),
topics: vec![],
}]
);
});
}
#[test]
fn doesnt_deposit_event_for_dups() {
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
// given
let time_slot = 42;
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
let offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence.clone()).unwrap();
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
f.clear();
});
// when
// report for the second time
assert_eq!(Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence), Err(OffenceError::DuplicateReport));
// then
// there is only one event.
assert_eq!(
System::events(),
vec![EventRecord {
phase: Phase::Initialization,
event: RuntimeEvent::Offences(crate::Event::Offence {
kind: KIND,
timeslot: time_slot.encode()
}),
topics: vec![],
}]
);
});
}
#[test]
fn reports_if_an_offence_is_dup() {
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
let time_slot = 42;
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
let offence =
|time_slot, offenders| Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders };
let mut test_offence = offence(time_slot, vec![0]);
// the report for authority 0 at time slot 42 should not be a known
// offence
assert!(!<Offences as ReportOffence<_, _, Offence>>::is_known_offence(
&test_offence.offenders,
&test_offence.time_slot
));
// we report an offence for authority 0 at time slot 42
Offences::report_offence(vec![], test_offence.clone()).unwrap();
// the same report should be a known offence now
assert!(<Offences as ReportOffence<_, _, Offence>>::is_known_offence(
&test_offence.offenders,
&test_offence.time_slot
));
// and reporting it again should yield a duplicate report error
assert_eq!(
Offences::report_offence(vec![], test_offence.clone()),
Err(OffenceError::DuplicateReport)
);
// after adding a new offender to the offence report
test_offence.offenders.push(1);
// it should not be a known offence anymore
assert!(!<Offences as ReportOffence<_, _, Offence>>::is_known_offence(
&test_offence.offenders,
&test_offence.time_slot
));
// and reporting it again should work without any error
assert_eq!(Offences::report_offence(vec![], test_offence.clone()), Ok(()));
// creating a new offence for the same authorities on the next slot
// should be considered a new offence and therefore not known
let test_offence_next_slot = offence(time_slot + 1, vec![0, 1]);
assert!(!<Offences as ReportOffence<_, _, Offence>>::is_known_offence(
&test_offence_next_slot.offenders,
&test_offence_next_slot.time_slot
));
});
}
#[test]
fn should_properly_count_offences() {
// We report two different authorities for the same issue. Ultimately, the 1st authority
// should have `count` equal 2 and the count of the 2nd one should be equal to 1.
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
// given
let time_slot = 42;
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
let offence1 = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
let offence2 = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![4] };
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence1).unwrap();
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
f.clear();
});
// when
// report for the second time
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence2).unwrap();
// then
// the 1st authority should have count 2 and the 2nd one should be reported only once.
assert_eq!(
offence_reports(KIND, time_slot),
vec![
OffenceDetails { offender: 5, reporters: vec![] },
OffenceDetails { offender: 4, reporters: vec![] },
]
);
});
}