mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-27 06:57:58 +00:00
002d9260f9
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments. **This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this repository.** Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits: - `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs` - `Fix spelling mistakes in test names` - `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and tracing` Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual commits for easier reviewing: - `Fix the spelling of 'authority'` - `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'` - `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'` - `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'` - `Fix the spelling of 'children'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'` - `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'` - `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'` - `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'` - `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'` - `Fix the spelling of 'until'` - `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'` - `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'` - `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'` - `Fix the spelling of 'indices'` - `Fix the spelling of 'committed'` - `Fix the spelling of 'topology'` - `Fix the spelling of 'response'` - `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'` - `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'` - `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'` - `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'` - `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'` - `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'` - `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'` - `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'` - `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'` - `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'` - `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'` - `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'` - `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'` - `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'` - `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'` - `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'` - `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'` - `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'` - `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'` - `Fix the spelling of 'network'` Let me know if this structure is adequate. **Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`, `Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it as it is. ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left it as it is.~~ ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~ ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~ **Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs `judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc. are both present in different places, but I suppose that's understandable given the number of contributors. ~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it is.~~
248 lines
6.9 KiB
Rust
248 lines
6.9 KiB
Rust
// This file is part of Substrate.
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (C) Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
//! Tests for the offences module.
|
|
|
|
#![cfg(test)]
|
|
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use crate::mock::{
|
|
new_test_ext, offence_reports, with_on_offence_fractions, Offence, Offences, RuntimeEvent,
|
|
System, KIND,
|
|
};
|
|
use frame_system::{EventRecord, Phase};
|
|
use sp_runtime::Perbill;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn should_report_an_authority_and_trigger_on_offence() {
|
|
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let time_slot = 42;
|
|
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
|
|
|
|
let offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
|
|
|
|
// when
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
|
|
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn should_not_report_the_same_authority_twice_in_the_same_slot() {
|
|
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let time_slot = 42;
|
|
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
|
|
|
|
let offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence.clone()).unwrap();
|
|
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
|
|
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
|
|
f.clear();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// when
|
|
// report for the second time
|
|
assert_eq!(Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence), Err(OffenceError::DuplicateReport));
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
|
|
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn should_report_in_different_time_slot() {
|
|
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let time_slot = 42;
|
|
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
|
|
|
|
let mut offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence.clone()).unwrap();
|
|
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
|
|
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
|
|
f.clear();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// when
|
|
// report for the second time
|
|
offence.time_slot += 1;
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
|
|
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn should_deposit_event() {
|
|
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let time_slot = 42;
|
|
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
|
|
|
|
let offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
|
|
|
|
// when
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
System::events(),
|
|
vec![EventRecord {
|
|
phase: Phase::Initialization,
|
|
event: RuntimeEvent::Offences(crate::Event::Offence {
|
|
kind: KIND,
|
|
timeslot: time_slot.encode()
|
|
}),
|
|
topics: vec![],
|
|
}]
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn doesnt_deposit_event_for_dups() {
|
|
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let time_slot = 42;
|
|
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
|
|
|
|
let offence = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence.clone()).unwrap();
|
|
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
|
|
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
|
|
f.clear();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// when
|
|
// report for the second time
|
|
assert_eq!(Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence), Err(OffenceError::DuplicateReport));
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
// there is only one event.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
System::events(),
|
|
vec![EventRecord {
|
|
phase: Phase::Initialization,
|
|
event: RuntimeEvent::Offences(crate::Event::Offence {
|
|
kind: KIND,
|
|
timeslot: time_slot.encode()
|
|
}),
|
|
topics: vec![],
|
|
}]
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reports_if_an_offence_is_dup() {
|
|
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let time_slot = 42;
|
|
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
|
|
|
|
let offence =
|
|
|time_slot, offenders| Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders };
|
|
|
|
let mut test_offence = offence(time_slot, vec![0]);
|
|
|
|
// the report for authority 0 at time slot 42 should not be a known
|
|
// offence
|
|
assert!(!<Offences as ReportOffence<_, _, Offence>>::is_known_offence(
|
|
&test_offence.offenders,
|
|
&test_offence.time_slot
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// we report an offence for authority 0 at time slot 42
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], test_offence.clone()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// the same report should be a known offence now
|
|
assert!(<Offences as ReportOffence<_, _, Offence>>::is_known_offence(
|
|
&test_offence.offenders,
|
|
&test_offence.time_slot
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// and reporting it again should yield a duplicate report error
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], test_offence.clone()),
|
|
Err(OffenceError::DuplicateReport)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// after adding a new offender to the offence report
|
|
test_offence.offenders.push(1);
|
|
|
|
// it should not be a known offence anymore
|
|
assert!(!<Offences as ReportOffence<_, _, Offence>>::is_known_offence(
|
|
&test_offence.offenders,
|
|
&test_offence.time_slot
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// and reporting it again should work without any error
|
|
assert_eq!(Offences::report_offence(vec![], test_offence.clone()), Ok(()));
|
|
|
|
// creating a new offence for the same authorities on the next slot
|
|
// should be considered a new offence and therefore not known
|
|
let test_offence_next_slot = offence(time_slot + 1, vec![0, 1]);
|
|
assert!(!<Offences as ReportOffence<_, _, Offence>>::is_known_offence(
|
|
&test_offence_next_slot.offenders,
|
|
&test_offence_next_slot.time_slot
|
|
));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn should_properly_count_offences() {
|
|
// We report two different authorities for the same issue. Ultimately, the 1st authority
|
|
// should have `count` equal 2 and the count of the 2nd one should be equal to 1.
|
|
new_test_ext().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let time_slot = 42;
|
|
assert_eq!(offence_reports(KIND, time_slot), vec![]);
|
|
|
|
let offence1 = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![5] };
|
|
let offence2 = Offence { validator_set_count: 5, time_slot, offenders: vec![4] };
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence1).unwrap();
|
|
with_on_offence_fractions(|f| {
|
|
assert_eq!(f.clone(), vec![Perbill::from_percent(25)]);
|
|
f.clear();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// when
|
|
// report for the second time
|
|
Offences::report_offence(vec![], offence2).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
// the 1st authority should have count 2 and the 2nd one should be reported only once.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
offence_reports(KIND, time_slot),
|
|
vec![
|
|
OffenceDetails { offender: 5, reporters: vec![] },
|
|
OffenceDetails { offender: 4, reporters: vec![] },
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|