mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-30 15:27:57 +00:00
fcc1574aac
(git subtree add --prefix=bridges bridges master --squash)
222 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
222 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
# Testing Scenarios
|
|
|
|
In the scenarios, for simplicity, we call the chains Kusama (KSM token) and Polkadot (DOT token),
|
|
but they should be applicable to any other chains. The first scenario has detailed description about
|
|
the entire process (also see the [sequence diagram](./scenario1.html)). Other scenarios only contain
|
|
a simplified interaction focusing on things that are unique for that particular scenario.
|
|
|
|
Notation:
|
|
- kX - user X interacting with Kusama chain.
|
|
- `k(kX)` - Kusama account id of user kX (native account id; usable on Kusama)
|
|
- `p(kX)` - Polkadot account id of user kX (account id derived from `k(kX)` usable on Polkadot)
|
|
- [Kusama] ... - Interaction happens on Kusama (e.g. the user interacts with Kusama chain)
|
|
- [Polkadot] ... - Interaction happens on Polkadot
|
|
|
|
Basic Scenarios
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
Scenario 1: Kusama's Alice receiving & spending DOTs
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Kusama's Alice (kAlice) receives 5 DOTs from Polkadot's Bob (pBob) and sends half of them to
|
|
kCharlie.
|
|
|
|
1. Generate kAlice's DOT address (`p(kAlice)`).
|
|
See function:
|
|
|
|
```rust
|
|
bp_runtime::derive_account_id(b"pdot", kAlice)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
or:
|
|
|
|
```rust
|
|
let hash = bp_polkadot::derive_kusama_account_id(kAlice);
|
|
let p_kAlice = bp_polkadot::AccountIdConverter::convert(hash);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2. [Polkadot] pBob transfers 5 DOTs to `p(kAlice)`
|
|
1. Creates & Signs a transaction with `Call::Transfer(..)`
|
|
1. It is included in block.
|
|
1. kAlice observers Polkadot chain to see her balance at `p(kAlice)` updated.
|
|
|
|
3. [Kusama] kAlice sends 2.5 DOTs to `p(kCharlie)`
|
|
1. kAlice prepares:
|
|
```rust
|
|
let call = polkadot::Call::Balances(polkadot::Balances::Transfer(p(kCharlie), 2.5DOT)).encode();
|
|
let weight = call.get_dispatch_info().weight;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
1. kAlice prepares Kusama transaction:
|
|
```rust
|
|
kusama::Call::Messages::<Instance=Polkadot>::send_message(
|
|
// dot-transfer-lane (truncated to 4bytes)
|
|
lane_id,
|
|
payload: MessagePayload {
|
|
// Get from current polkadot runtime (kind of hardcoded)
|
|
spec_version: 1,
|
|
// kAlice should know the exact dispatch weight of the call on the target
|
|
// source verifies: at least to cover call.length() and below max weight
|
|
weight,
|
|
// simply bytes, we don't know anything about that on the source chain
|
|
call,
|
|
// origin that should be used during dispatch on the target chain
|
|
origin: CallOrigin::SourceAccount(kAlice),
|
|
},
|
|
delivery_and_dispatch_fee: {
|
|
(single_message_delivery_weight
|
|
// source weight = X * target weight
|
|
+ convert_target_weight_to_source_weight(weight)
|
|
+ confirmation_transaction_weight
|
|
)
|
|
// This uses an on-chain oracle to convert weights of the target chain to source fee
|
|
* weight_to_fee
|
|
// additional reward for the relayer (pallet parameter)
|
|
+ relayers_fee
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
1. [Kusama] kAlice sends Kusama transaction with the above `Call` and pays regular fees. The
|
|
dispatch additionally reservers target-chain delivery and dispatch fees (including relayer's
|
|
reward).
|
|
|
|
4. [Kusama] kAlice's transaction is included in block `B1`
|
|
|
|
### Syncing headers loop
|
|
|
|
5. Relayer sees that `B1` has not yet been delivered to the target chain.
|
|
[Sync loop code](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/blob/8b327a94595c4a6fae6d7866e24ecf2390501e32/relays/headers-relay/src/sync_loop.rs#L199).
|
|
|
|
1. Relayer prepares transaction which delivers `B1` and with all of the missing
|
|
ancestors to the target chain (one header per transaction).
|
|
|
|
1. After the transaction is succesfully dispatched the Polkadot on-chain light client of the Kusama
|
|
chain learns about block `B1` - it is stored in the on-chain storage.
|
|
|
|
### Syncing finality loop
|
|
|
|
8. Relayer is subscribed to finality events on Kusama. Relayer gets a finality notification for
|
|
block `B3`.
|
|
|
|
1. The header sync informs the target chain about `B1..B3` blocks (see point 6).
|
|
|
|
1. Relayer learns about missing finalization of `B1..B3` on the target chain, see
|
|
[finality maintenance code](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/blob/8b327a94595c4a6fae6d7866e24ecf2390501e32/relays/substrate/src/headers_maintain.rs#L107).
|
|
|
|
1. Relayer submits justification for `B3` to the target chain (`finalize_header`).
|
|
See [#421](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/421) for multiple
|
|
authority set changes support in Relayer (i.e. what block the target chain expects, not only
|
|
what I have).
|
|
|
|
Relayer is doing two things:
|
|
- syncing on demand (what blocks miss finality)
|
|
- and syncing as notifications are received (recently finalized on-chain)
|
|
|
|
1. Eventually Polkadot on-chain light client of Kusama learns about finality of `B1`.
|
|
|
|
### Syncing messages loop
|
|
|
|
13. The relayer checks the on-chain storage (last finalized header on the source, best header on the
|
|
target):
|
|
- Kusama outbound lane
|
|
- Polkadot inbound lane
|
|
Lanes contains `latest_generated_nonce` and `latest_received_nonce` respectively. The relayer
|
|
syncs messages between that range.
|
|
|
|
1. The relayer gets a proof for every message in that range (using the RPC of messages module)
|
|
|
|
1. The relayer creates a message delivery transaction (but it has weight, size, and count limits).
|
|
The count limit is there to make the loop of delivery code bounded.
|
|
```rust
|
|
receive_message_proof(
|
|
relayer_id, // account id of the source chain
|
|
proof, // messages + proofs (hash of source block `B1`, nonces, lane_id + storage proof)
|
|
dispatch_weight // relayer declares how much it will take to dispatch all messages in that transaction,
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
The `proof` can also contain an update of outbound lane state of source chain, which indicates
|
|
the delivery confirmation of these messages and reward payment, so that the target chain can
|
|
truncate its unpayed rewards vector.
|
|
|
|
The target chain stores `relayer_ids` that delivered messages because the relayer can generate
|
|
a storage proof to show that they did indeed deliver those messages. The reward is paid on the
|
|
source chain and we inform the target chain about that fact so it can prune these `relayer_ids`.
|
|
|
|
It's totally fine if there are no messages, and we only include the reward payment proof
|
|
when calling that function.
|
|
|
|
1. 🥳 the message is now delivered and dispatched on the target chain!
|
|
|
|
1. The relayer now needs to confirm the delivery to claim her payment and reward on the source
|
|
chain.
|
|
|
|
1. The relayer creates a transaction on the source chain with call:
|
|
|
|
```rust
|
|
receive_messages_delivery_proof(
|
|
proof, // hash of the finalized target chain block, lane_id, storage proof
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### UI challenges
|
|
|
|
- The UI should warn before (or prevent) sending to `k(kCharlie)`!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario 2: Kusama's Alice nominating validators with her DOTs
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
kAlice receives 10 DOTs from pBob and nominates `p(pCharlie)` and `p(pDave)`.
|
|
|
|
1. Generate kAlice's DOT address (`p(kAlice)`)
|
|
2. [Polkadot] pBob transfers 5 DOTs to `p(kAlice)`
|
|
3. [Kusama] kAlice sends a batch transaction:
|
|
- `staking::Bond` transaction to create stash account choosing `p(kAlice)` as the controller account.
|
|
- `staking::Nominate(vec![p(pCharlie)])` to nominate pCharlie using the controller account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario 3: Kusama Treasury receiving & spending DOTs
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
pBob sends 15 DOTs to Kusama Treasury which Kusama Governance decides to transfer to kCharlie.
|
|
|
|
1. Generate source account for the treasury (`kTreasury`).
|
|
2. [Polkadot] pBob tarnsfers 15 DOTs to `p(kTreasury)`.
|
|
2. [Kusama] Send a governance proposal to send a bridge message which transfers funds to `p(kCharlie)`.
|
|
3. [Kusama] Dispatch the governance proposal using `kTreasury` account id.
|
|
|
|
Extra scenarios
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
Scenario 4: Kusama's Alice setting up 1-of-2 multi-sig to spend from either Kusama or Polkadot
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Assuming `p(pAlice)` has at least 7 DOTs already.
|
|
|
|
1. Generate multisig account id: `pMultiSig = multi_account_id(&[p(kAlice), p(pAlice)], 1)`.
|
|
2. [Kusama] Transfer 7 DOTs to `pMultiSig` using `TargetAccount` origin of `pAlice`.
|
|
3. [Kusama] Transfer 2 DOTs to `p(kAlice)` from the multisig:
|
|
- Send `multisig::as_multi_threshold_1(vec![p(pAlice)], balances::Transfer(p(kAlice), 2))`
|
|
|
|
Scenario 5: Kusama Treasury staking & nominating validators with DOTs
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Scenario 6: Kusama Treasury voting in Polkadot's democracy proposal
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Potentially interesting scenarios
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
Scenario 7: Polkadot's Bob spending his DOTs by using Kusama chain
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
We can assume he holds KSM. Problem: he can pay fees, but can't really send (sign) a transaction?
|
|
Shall we support some kind of dispatcher?
|
|
|
|
Scenario 8: Kusama Governance taking over Kusama's Alice DOT holdings
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
We use `SourceRoot` call to transfer her's DOTs to Kusama treasury. Source chain root
|
|
should also be able to send messages as `CallOrigin::SourceAccount(Alice)` though.
|