mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-26 06:27:58 +00:00
ec7bfae00a
## Why we need it To provide another level of understanding to why polkadot's subsystems may perform slower than expected. Cache misses occur when processing large amounts of data, such as during availability recovery. ## Why Cachegrind Cachegrind has many drawbacks: it is slow, it uses its own cache simulation, which is very basic. But unlike `perf`, which is a great tool, Cachegrind can run in a virtual machine. This means we can easily run it in remote installations and even use it in CI/CD to catch possible regressions. Why Cachegrind and not Callgrind, another part of Valgrind? It is simply empirically proven that profiling runs faster with Cachegrind. ## First results First results have been obtained while testing of the approach. Here is an example. ``` $ target/testnet/subsystem-bench --n-cores 10 --cache-misses data-availability-read $ cat cachegrind_report.txt I refs: 64,622,081,485 I1 misses: 3,018,168 LLi misses: 437,654 I1 miss rate: 0.00% LLi miss rate: 0.00% D refs: 12,161,833,115 (9,868,356,364 rd + 2,293,476,751 wr) D1 misses: 167,940,701 ( 71,060,073 rd + 96,880,628 wr) LLd misses: 33,550,018 ( 16,685,853 rd + 16,864,165 wr) D1 miss rate: 1.4% ( 0.7% + 4.2% ) LLd miss rate: 0.3% ( 0.2% + 0.7% ) LL refs: 170,958,869 ( 74,078,241 rd + 96,880,628 wr) LL misses: 33,987,672 ( 17,123,507 rd + 16,864,165 wr) LL miss rate: 0.0% ( 0.0% + 0.7% ) ``` The CLI output shows that 1.4% of the L1 data cache missed, which is not so bad, given that the last-level cache had that data most of the time missing only 0.3%. Instruction data of the L1 has 0.00% misses of the time. Looking at an output file with `cg_annotate` shows that most of the misses occur during reed-solomon, which is expected.
287 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
287 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
# Subsystem benchmark client
|
|
|
|
Run parachain consensus stress and performance tests on your development machine.
|
|
|
|
## Motivation
|
|
|
|
The parachain consensus node implementation spans across many modules which we call subsystems. Each subsystem is
|
|
responsible for a small part of logic of the parachain consensus pipeline, but in general the most load and
|
|
performance issues are localized in just a few core subsystems like `availability-recovery`, `approval-voting` or
|
|
`dispute-coordinator`. In the absence of such a tool, we would run large test nets to load/stress test these parts of
|
|
the system. Setting up and making sense of the amount of data produced by such a large test is very expensive, hard
|
|
to orchestrate and is a huge development time sink.
|
|
|
|
This tool aims to solve the problem by making it easy to:
|
|
|
|
- set up and run core subsystem load tests locally on your development machine
|
|
- iterate and conclude faster when benchmarking new optimizations or comparing implementations
|
|
- automate and keep track of performance regressions in CI runs
|
|
- simulate various networking topologies, bandwidth and connectivity issues
|
|
|
|
## Test environment setup
|
|
|
|
`cargo build --profile=testnet --bin subsystem-bench -p polkadot-subsystem-bench`
|
|
|
|
The output binary will be placed in `target/testnet/subsystem-bench`.
|
|
|
|
### Test metrics
|
|
|
|
Subsystem, CPU usage and network metrics are exposed via a prometheus endpoint during the test execution.
|
|
A small subset of these collected metrics are displayed in the CLI, but for an in depth analysys of the test results,
|
|
a local Grafana/Prometheus stack is needed.
|
|
|
|
### Run Prometheus, Pyroscope and Graphana in Docker
|
|
|
|
If docker is not usable, then follow the next sections to manually install Prometheus, Pyroscope and Graphana on your machine.
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
cd polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/docker
|
|
docker compose up
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Install Prometheus
|
|
|
|
Please follow the [official installation guide](https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/installation/) for your
|
|
platform/OS.
|
|
|
|
After succesfully installing and starting up Prometheus, we need to alter it's configuration such that it
|
|
will scrape the benchmark prometheus endpoint `127.0.0.1:9999`. Please check the prometheus official documentation
|
|
regarding the location of `prometheus.yml`. On MacOS for example the full path `/opt/homebrew/etc/prometheus.yml`
|
|
|
|
prometheus.yml:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
global:
|
|
scrape_interval: 5s
|
|
|
|
scrape_configs:
|
|
- job_name: "prometheus"
|
|
static_configs:
|
|
- targets: ["localhost:9090"]
|
|
- job_name: "subsystem-bench"
|
|
scrape_interval: 0s500ms
|
|
static_configs:
|
|
- targets: ['localhost:9999']
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To complete this step restart Prometheus server such that it picks up the new configuration.
|
|
|
|
### Install Pyroscope
|
|
|
|
To collect CPU profiling data, you must be running the Pyroscope server.
|
|
Follow the [installation guide](https://grafana.com/docs/pyroscope/latest/get-started/)
|
|
relevant to your operating system.
|
|
|
|
### Install Grafana
|
|
|
|
Follow the [installation guide](https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/setup-grafana/installation/) relevant
|
|
to your operating system.
|
|
|
|
### Setup Grafana
|
|
|
|
Once you have the installation up and running, configure the local Prometheus and Pyroscope (if needed)
|
|
as data sources by following these guides:
|
|
|
|
- [Prometheus](https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/datasources/prometheus/configure-prometheus-data-source/)
|
|
- [Pyroscope](https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/datasources/grafana-pyroscope/)
|
|
|
|
If you are running the servers in Docker, use the following URLs:
|
|
|
|
- Prometheus `http://prometheus:9090/`
|
|
- Pyroscope `http://pyroscope:4040/`
|
|
|
|
#### Import dashboards
|
|
|
|
Follow [this guide](https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/dashboards/manage-dashboards/#export-and-import-dashboards)
|
|
to import the dashboards from the repository `grafana` folder.
|
|
|
|
## How to run a test
|
|
|
|
To run a test, you need to first choose a test objective. Currently, we support the following:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
target/testnet/subsystem-bench --help
|
|
The almighty Subsystem Benchmark Tool™️
|
|
|
|
Usage: subsystem-bench [OPTIONS] <COMMAND>
|
|
|
|
Commands:
|
|
data-availability-read Benchmark availability recovery strategies
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Note: `test-sequence` is a special test objective that wraps up an arbitrary number of test objectives. It is tipically
|
|
used to run a suite of tests defined in a `yaml` file like in this [example](examples/availability_read.yaml).
|
|
|
|
### Standard test options
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Options:
|
|
--network <NETWORK> The type of network to be emulated [default: ideal] [possible
|
|
values: ideal, healthy, degraded]
|
|
--n-cores <N_CORES> Number of cores to fetch availability for [default: 100]
|
|
--n-validators <N_VALIDATORS> Number of validators to fetch chunks from [default: 500]
|
|
--min-pov-size <MIN_POV_SIZE> The minimum pov size in KiB [default: 5120]
|
|
--max-pov-size <MAX_POV_SIZE> The maximum pov size bytes [default: 5120]
|
|
-n, --num-blocks <NUM_BLOCKS> The number of blocks the test is going to run [default: 1]
|
|
-p, --peer-bandwidth <PEER_BANDWIDTH> The bandwidth of simulated remote peers in KiB
|
|
-b, --bandwidth <BANDWIDTH> The bandwidth of our simulated node in KiB
|
|
--peer-error <PEER_ERROR> Simulated conection error ratio [0-100]
|
|
--peer-min-latency <PEER_MIN_LATENCY> Minimum remote peer latency in milliseconds [0-5000]
|
|
--peer-max-latency <PEER_MAX_LATENCY> Maximum remote peer latency in milliseconds [0-5000]
|
|
--profile Enable CPU Profiling with Pyroscope
|
|
--pyroscope-url <PYROSCOPE_URL> Pyroscope Server URL [default: http://localhost:4040]
|
|
--pyroscope-sample-rate <PYROSCOPE_SAMPLE_RATE> Pyroscope Sample Rate [default: 113]
|
|
--cache-misses Enable Cache Misses Profiling with Valgrind. Linux only, Valgrind
|
|
must be in the PATH
|
|
-h, --help Print help
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
These apply to all test objectives, except `test-sequence` which relies on the values being specified in a file.
|
|
|
|
### Test objectives
|
|
|
|
Each test objective can have it's specific configuration options, in contrast with the standard test options.
|
|
|
|
For `data-availability-read` the recovery strategy to be used is configurable.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
target/testnet/subsystem-bench data-availability-read --help
|
|
Benchmark availability recovery strategies
|
|
|
|
Usage: subsystem-bench data-availability-read [OPTIONS]
|
|
|
|
Options:
|
|
-f, --fetch-from-backers Turbo boost AD Read by fetching the full availability datafrom backers first. Saves CPU
|
|
as we don't need to re-construct from chunks. Tipically this is only faster if nodes
|
|
have enough bandwidth
|
|
-h, --help Print help
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Understanding the test configuration
|
|
|
|
A single test configuration `TestConfiguration` struct applies to a single run of a certain test objective.
|
|
|
|
The configuration describes the following important parameters that influence the test duration and resource
|
|
usage:
|
|
|
|
- how many validators are on the emulated network (`n_validators`)
|
|
- how many cores per block the subsystem will have to do work on (`n_cores`)
|
|
- for how many blocks the test should run (`num_blocks`)
|
|
|
|
From the perspective of the subsystem under test, this means that it will receive an `ActiveLeavesUpdate` signal
|
|
followed by an arbitrary amount of messages. This process repeats itself for `num_blocks`. The messages are generally
|
|
test payloads pre-generated before the test run, or constructed on pre-genereated payloads. For example the
|
|
`AvailabilityRecoveryMessage::RecoverAvailableData` message includes a `CandidateReceipt` which is generated before
|
|
the test is started.
|
|
|
|
### Example run
|
|
|
|
Let's run an availabilty read test which will recover availability for 10 cores with max PoV size on a 500
|
|
node validator network.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
target/testnet/subsystem-bench --n-cores 10 data-availability-read
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:01:59Z INFO subsystem_bench::core::display] n_validators = 500, n_cores = 10, pov_size = 5120 - 5120,
|
|
error = 0, latency = None
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:01:59Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Generating template candidate index=0 pov_size=5242880
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:01:59Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Created test environment.
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:01:59Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Pre-generating 10 candidates.
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:01Z INFO subsystem-bench::core] Initializing network emulation for 500 peers.
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:01Z INFO substrate_prometheus_endpoint] 〽️ Prometheus exporter started at 127.0.0.1:9999
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:01Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Current block 1/1
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:01Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] 10 recoveries pending
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:04Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] Block time 3231ms
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:04Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Sleeping till end of block (2768ms)
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:07Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] All blocks processed in 6001ms
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:07Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] Throughput: 51200 KiB/block
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:07Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] Block time: 6001 ms
|
|
[2023-11-28T09:02:07Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability]
|
|
|
|
Total received from network: 66 MiB
|
|
Total sent to network: 58 KiB
|
|
Total subsystem CPU usage 4.16s
|
|
CPU usage per block 4.16s
|
|
Total test environment CPU usage 0.00s
|
|
CPU usage per block 0.00s
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
`Block time` in the context of `data-availability-read` has a different meaning. It measures the amount of time it
|
|
took the subsystem to finish processing all of the messages sent in the context of the current test block.
|
|
|
|
### Test logs
|
|
|
|
You can select log target, subtarget and verbosity just like with Polkadot node CLI, simply setting
|
|
`RUST_LOOG="parachain=debug"` turns on debug logs for all parachain consensus subsystems in the test.
|
|
|
|
### View test metrics
|
|
|
|
Assuming the Grafana/Prometheus stack installation steps completed succesfully, you should be able to
|
|
view the test progress in real time by accessing [this link](http://localhost:3000/goto/SM5B8pNSR?orgId=1).
|
|
|
|
Now run
|
|
`target/testnet/subsystem-bench test-sequence --path polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml`
|
|
and view the metrics in real time and spot differences between different `n_validators` values.
|
|
|
|
### Profiling cache misses
|
|
|
|
Cache misses are profiled using Cachegrind, part of Valgrind. Cachegrind runs slowly, and its cache simulation is basic
|
|
and unlikely to reflect the behavior of a modern machine. However, it still represents the general situation with cache
|
|
usage, and more importantly it doesn't require a bare-metal machine to run on, which means it could be run in CI or in
|
|
a remote virtual installation.
|
|
|
|
To profile cache misses use the `--cache-misses` flag. Cache simulation of current runs tuned for Intel Ice Lake CPU.
|
|
Since the execution will be very slow, it's recommended not to run it together with other profiling and not to take
|
|
benchmark results into account. A report is saved in a file `cachegrind_report.txt`.
|
|
|
|
Example run results:
|
|
```
|
|
$ target/testnet/subsystem-bench --n-cores 10 --cache-misses data-availability-read
|
|
$ cat cachegrind_report.txt
|
|
I refs: 64,622,081,485
|
|
I1 misses: 3,018,168
|
|
LLi misses: 437,654
|
|
I1 miss rate: 0.00%
|
|
LLi miss rate: 0.00%
|
|
|
|
D refs: 12,161,833,115 (9,868,356,364 rd + 2,293,476,751 wr)
|
|
D1 misses: 167,940,701 ( 71,060,073 rd + 96,880,628 wr)
|
|
LLd misses: 33,550,018 ( 16,685,853 rd + 16,864,165 wr)
|
|
D1 miss rate: 1.4% ( 0.7% + 4.2% )
|
|
LLd miss rate: 0.3% ( 0.2% + 0.7% )
|
|
|
|
LL refs: 170,958,869 ( 74,078,241 rd + 96,880,628 wr)
|
|
LL misses: 33,987,672 ( 17,123,507 rd + 16,864,165 wr)
|
|
LL miss rate: 0.0% ( 0.0% + 0.7% )
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The results show that 1.4% of the L1 data cache missed, but the last level cache only missed 0.3% of the time.
|
|
Instruction data of the L1 has 0.00%.
|
|
|
|
Cachegrind writes line-by-line cache profiling information to a file named `cachegrind.out.<pid>`.
|
|
This file is best interpreted with `cg_annotate --auto=yes cachegrind.out.<pid>`. For more information see the
|
|
[cachegrind manual](https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/cmt-40/Nice/RuleRefinement/bin/valgrind-3.2.0/docs/html/cg-manual.html).
|
|
|
|
For finer profiling of cache misses, better use `perf` on a bare-metal machine.
|
|
|
|
## Create new test objectives
|
|
|
|
This tool is intended to make it easy to write new test objectives that focus individual subsystems,
|
|
or even multiple subsystems (for example `approval-distribution` and `approval-voting`).
|
|
|
|
A special kind of test objectives are performance regression tests for the CI pipeline. These should be sequences
|
|
of tests that check the performance characteristics (such as CPU usage, speed) of the subsystem under test in both
|
|
happy and negative scenarios (low bandwidth, network errors and low connectivity).
|
|
|
|
### Reusable test components
|
|
|
|
To faster write a new test objective you need to use some higher level wrappers and logic: `TestEnvironment`,
|
|
`TestConfiguration`, `TestAuthorities`, `NetworkEmulator`. To create the `TestEnvironment` you will
|
|
need to also build an `Overseer`, but that should be easy using the mockups for subsystems in`core::mock`.
|
|
|
|
### Mocking
|
|
|
|
Ideally we want to have a single mock implementation for subsystems that can be minimally configured to
|
|
be used in different tests. A good example is `runtime-api` which currently only responds to session information
|
|
requests based on static data. It can be easily extended to service other requests.
|