Files
pezkuwi-subxt/polkadot/runtime/parachains/src/disputes.rs
T
Shawn Tabrizi ff5d56fb76 cargo +nightly fmt (#3540)
* cargo +nightly fmt

* add cargo-fmt check to ci

* update ci

* fmt

* fmt

* skip macro

* ignore bridges
2021-08-02 10:47:33 +00:00

2875 lines
80 KiB
Rust

// Copyright 2021 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
// This file is part of Polkadot.
// Polkadot is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
// Polkadot is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with Polkadot. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
//! Runtime component for handling disputes of parachain candidates.
use crate::{
configuration::{self, HostConfiguration},
initializer::SessionChangeNotification,
session_info,
};
use bitvec::{bitvec, order::Lsb0 as BitOrderLsb0};
use frame_support::{ensure, traits::Get, weights::Weight};
use parity_scale_codec::{Decode, Encode};
use primitives::v1::{
byzantine_threshold, supermajority_threshold, ApprovalVote, CandidateHash, CompactStatement,
ConsensusLog, DisputeState, DisputeStatement, DisputeStatementSet, ExplicitDisputeStatement,
InvalidDisputeStatementKind, MultiDisputeStatementSet, SessionIndex, SigningContext,
ValidDisputeStatementKind, ValidatorId, ValidatorIndex, ValidatorSignature,
};
use sp_runtime::{
traits::{AppVerify, One, Saturating, Zero},
DispatchError, RuntimeDebug, SaturatedConversion,
};
use sp_std::{collections::btree_set::BTreeSet, prelude::*};
/// Whether the dispute is local or remote.
#[derive(Encode, Decode, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, RuntimeDebug)]
pub enum DisputeLocation {
Local,
Remote,
}
/// The result of a dispute, whether the candidate is deemed valid (for) or invalid (against).
#[derive(Encode, Decode, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, RuntimeDebug)]
pub enum DisputeResult {
Valid,
Invalid,
}
/// Reward hooks for disputes.
pub trait RewardValidators {
// Give each validator a reward, likely small, for participating in the dispute.
fn reward_dispute_statement(
session: SessionIndex,
validators: impl IntoIterator<Item = ValidatorIndex>,
);
}
impl RewardValidators for () {
fn reward_dispute_statement(_: SessionIndex, _: impl IntoIterator<Item = ValidatorIndex>) {}
}
/// Punishment hooks for disputes.
pub trait PunishValidators {
/// Punish a series of validators who were for an invalid parablock. This is expected to be a major
/// punishment.
fn punish_for_invalid(
session: SessionIndex,
validators: impl IntoIterator<Item = ValidatorIndex>,
);
/// Punish a series of validators who were against a valid parablock. This is expected to be a minor
/// punishment.
fn punish_against_valid(
session: SessionIndex,
validators: impl IntoIterator<Item = ValidatorIndex>,
);
/// Punish a series of validators who were part of a dispute which never concluded. This is expected
/// to be a minor punishment.
fn punish_inconclusive(
session: SessionIndex,
validators: impl IntoIterator<Item = ValidatorIndex>,
);
}
impl PunishValidators for () {
fn punish_for_invalid(_: SessionIndex, _: impl IntoIterator<Item = ValidatorIndex>) {}
fn punish_against_valid(_: SessionIndex, _: impl IntoIterator<Item = ValidatorIndex>) {}
fn punish_inconclusive(_: SessionIndex, _: impl IntoIterator<Item = ValidatorIndex>) {}
}
/// Hook into disputes handling.
///
/// Allows decoupling parachains handling from disputes so that it can
/// potentially be disabled when instantiating a specific runtime.
pub trait DisputesHandler<BlockNumber> {
/// Whether the chain is frozen, if the chain is frozen it will not accept
/// any new parachain blocks for backing or inclusion.
fn is_frozen() -> bool;
/// Handler for filtering any dispute statements before including them as part
/// of inherent data. This can be useful to filter out ancient and duplicate
/// dispute statements.
fn filter_multi_dispute_data(statement_sets: &mut MultiDisputeStatementSet);
/// Handle sets of dispute statements corresponding to 0 or more candidates.
/// Returns a vector of freshly created disputes.
fn provide_multi_dispute_data(
statement_sets: MultiDisputeStatementSet,
) -> Result<Vec<(SessionIndex, CandidateHash)>, DispatchError>;
/// Note that the given candidate has been included.
fn note_included(
session: SessionIndex,
candidate_hash: CandidateHash,
included_in: BlockNumber,
);
/// Whether the given candidate could be invalid, i.e. there is an ongoing
/// or concluded dispute with supermajority-against.
fn could_be_invalid(session: SessionIndex, candidate_hash: CandidateHash) -> bool;
/// Called by the initializer to initialize the configuration module.
fn initializer_initialize(now: BlockNumber) -> Weight;
/// Called by the initializer to finalize the configuration module.
fn initializer_finalize();
/// Called by the initializer to note that a new session has started.
fn initializer_on_new_session(notification: &SessionChangeNotification<BlockNumber>);
}
impl<BlockNumber> DisputesHandler<BlockNumber> for () {
fn is_frozen() -> bool {
false
}
fn filter_multi_dispute_data(statement_sets: &mut MultiDisputeStatementSet) {
statement_sets.clear()
}
fn provide_multi_dispute_data(
_statement_sets: MultiDisputeStatementSet,
) -> Result<Vec<(SessionIndex, CandidateHash)>, DispatchError> {
Ok(Vec::new())
}
fn note_included(
_session: SessionIndex,
_candidate_hash: CandidateHash,
_included_in: BlockNumber,
) {
}
fn could_be_invalid(_session: SessionIndex, _candidate_hash: CandidateHash) -> bool {
false
}
fn initializer_initialize(_now: BlockNumber) -> Weight {
0
}
fn initializer_finalize() {}
fn initializer_on_new_session(_notification: &SessionChangeNotification<BlockNumber>) {}
}
impl<T: Config> DisputesHandler<T::BlockNumber> for pallet::Pallet<T> {
fn is_frozen() -> bool {
pallet::Pallet::<T>::is_frozen()
}
fn filter_multi_dispute_data(statement_sets: &mut MultiDisputeStatementSet) {
pallet::Pallet::<T>::filter_multi_dispute_data(statement_sets)
}
fn provide_multi_dispute_data(
statement_sets: MultiDisputeStatementSet,
) -> Result<Vec<(SessionIndex, CandidateHash)>, DispatchError> {
pallet::Pallet::<T>::provide_multi_dispute_data(statement_sets)
}
fn note_included(
session: SessionIndex,
candidate_hash: CandidateHash,
included_in: T::BlockNumber,
) {
pallet::Pallet::<T>::note_included(session, candidate_hash, included_in)
}
fn could_be_invalid(session: SessionIndex, candidate_hash: CandidateHash) -> bool {
pallet::Pallet::<T>::could_be_invalid(session, candidate_hash)
}
fn initializer_initialize(now: T::BlockNumber) -> Weight {
pallet::Pallet::<T>::initializer_initialize(now)
}
fn initializer_finalize() {
pallet::Pallet::<T>::initializer_finalize()
}
fn initializer_on_new_session(notification: &SessionChangeNotification<T::BlockNumber>) {
pallet::Pallet::<T>::initializer_on_new_session(notification)
}
}
pub use pallet::*;
#[frame_support::pallet]
pub mod pallet {
use super::*;
use frame_support::pallet_prelude::*;
#[pallet::config]
pub trait Config: frame_system::Config + configuration::Config + session_info::Config {
type Event: From<Event<Self>> + IsType<<Self as frame_system::Config>::Event>;
type RewardValidators: RewardValidators;
type PunishValidators: PunishValidators;
}
#[pallet::pallet]
pub struct Pallet<T>(_);
/// The last pruned session, if any. All data stored by this module
/// references sessions.
#[pallet::storage]
pub(super) type LastPrunedSession<T> = StorageValue<_, SessionIndex>;
/// All ongoing or concluded disputes for the last several sessions.
#[pallet::storage]
pub(super) type Disputes<T: Config> = StorageDoubleMap<
_,
Twox64Concat,
SessionIndex,
Blake2_128Concat,
CandidateHash,
DisputeState<T::BlockNumber>,
>;
/// All included blocks on the chain, as well as the block number in this chain that
/// should be reverted back to if the candidate is disputed and determined to be invalid.
#[pallet::storage]
pub(super) type Included<T: Config> = StorageDoubleMap<
_,
Twox64Concat,
SessionIndex,
Blake2_128Concat,
CandidateHash,
T::BlockNumber,
>;
/// Maps session indices to a vector indicating the number of potentially-spam disputes
/// each validator is participating in. Potentially-spam disputes are remote disputes which have
/// fewer than `byzantine_threshold + 1` validators.
///
/// The i'th entry of the vector corresponds to the i'th validator in the session.
#[pallet::storage]
pub(super) type SpamSlots<T> = StorageMap<_, Twox64Concat, SessionIndex, Vec<u32>>;
/// Whether the chain is frozen. Starts as `None`. When this is `Some`,
/// the chain will not accept any new parachain blocks for backing or inclusion,
/// and its value indicates the last valid block number in the chain.
/// It can only be set back to `None` by governance intervention.
#[pallet::storage]
#[pallet::getter(fn last_valid_block)]
pub(super) type Frozen<T: Config> = StorageValue<_, Option<T::BlockNumber>, ValueQuery>;
#[pallet::event]
#[pallet::generate_deposit(pub fn deposit_event)]
pub enum Event<T: Config> {
/// A dispute has been initiated. \[candidate hash, dispute location\]
DisputeInitiated(CandidateHash, DisputeLocation),
/// A dispute has concluded for or against a candidate.
/// `\[para id, candidate hash, dispute result\]`
DisputeConcluded(CandidateHash, DisputeResult),
/// A dispute has timed out due to insufficient participation.
/// `\[para id, candidate hash\]`
DisputeTimedOut(CandidateHash),
/// A dispute has concluded with supermajority against a candidate.
/// Block authors should no longer build on top of this head and should
/// instead revert to the block at the given height which is the last
/// known valid block in this chain.
Revert(T::BlockNumber),
}
#[pallet::error]
pub enum Error<T> {
/// Duplicate dispute statement sets provided.
DuplicateDisputeStatementSets,
/// Ancient dispute statement provided.
AncientDisputeStatement,
/// Validator index on statement is out of bounds for session.
ValidatorIndexOutOfBounds,
/// Invalid signature on statement.
InvalidSignature,
/// Validator vote submitted more than once to dispute.
DuplicateStatement,
/// Too many spam slots used by some specific validator.
PotentialSpam,
}
}
bitflags::bitflags! {
#[derive(Default)]
struct DisputeStateFlags: u8 {
const CONFIRMED = 0b0001;
const FOR_SUPERMAJORITY = 0b0010;
const AGAINST_SUPERMAJORITY = 0b0100;
}
}
impl DisputeStateFlags {
fn from_state<BlockNumber>(state: &DisputeState<BlockNumber>) -> Self {
let n = state.validators_for.len();
let byzantine_threshold = byzantine_threshold(n);
let supermajority_threshold = supermajority_threshold(n);
let mut flags = DisputeStateFlags::default();
let all_participants = {
let mut a = state.validators_for.clone();
*a |= state.validators_against.iter().by_val();
a
};
if all_participants.count_ones() > byzantine_threshold {
flags |= DisputeStateFlags::CONFIRMED;
}
if state.validators_for.count_ones() >= supermajority_threshold {
flags |= DisputeStateFlags::FOR_SUPERMAJORITY;
}
if state.validators_against.count_ones() >= supermajority_threshold {
flags |= DisputeStateFlags::AGAINST_SUPERMAJORITY;
}
flags
}
}
#[derive(PartialEq, RuntimeDebug)]
enum SpamSlotChange {
Inc,
Dec,
}
struct ImportSummary<BlockNumber> {
// The new state, with all votes imported.
state: DisputeState<BlockNumber>,
// Changes to spam slots. Validator index paired with directional change.
spam_slot_changes: Vec<(ValidatorIndex, SpamSlotChange)>,
// Validators to slash for being (wrongly) on the AGAINST side.
slash_against: Vec<ValidatorIndex>,
// Validators to slash for being (wrongly) on the FOR side.
slash_for: Vec<ValidatorIndex>,
// New participants in the dispute.
new_participants: bitvec::vec::BitVec<BitOrderLsb0, u8>,
// Difference in state flags from previous.
new_flags: DisputeStateFlags,
}
#[derive(RuntimeDebug, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum VoteImportError {
ValidatorIndexOutOfBounds,
DuplicateStatement,
}
impl<T: Config> From<VoteImportError> for Error<T> {
fn from(e: VoteImportError) -> Self {
match e {
VoteImportError::ValidatorIndexOutOfBounds => Error::<T>::ValidatorIndexOutOfBounds,
VoteImportError::DuplicateStatement => Error::<T>::DuplicateStatement,
}
}
}
struct DisputeStateImporter<BlockNumber> {
state: DisputeState<BlockNumber>,
now: BlockNumber,
new_participants: bitvec::vec::BitVec<BitOrderLsb0, u8>,
pre_flags: DisputeStateFlags,
}
impl<BlockNumber: Clone> DisputeStateImporter<BlockNumber> {
fn new(state: DisputeState<BlockNumber>, now: BlockNumber) -> Self {
let pre_flags = DisputeStateFlags::from_state(&state);
let new_participants = bitvec::bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; state.validators_for.len()];
DisputeStateImporter { state, now, new_participants, pre_flags }
}
fn import(&mut self, validator: ValidatorIndex, valid: bool) -> Result<(), VoteImportError> {
let (bits, other_bits) = if valid {
(&mut self.state.validators_for, &mut self.state.validators_against)
} else {
(&mut self.state.validators_against, &mut self.state.validators_for)
};
// out of bounds or already participated
match bits.get(validator.0 as usize).map(|b| *b) {
None => return Err(VoteImportError::ValidatorIndexOutOfBounds),
Some(true) => return Err(VoteImportError::DuplicateStatement),
Some(false) => {},
}
// inefficient, and just for extra sanity.
if validator.0 as usize >= self.new_participants.len() {
return Err(VoteImportError::ValidatorIndexOutOfBounds)
}
bits.set(validator.0 as usize, true);
// New participants tracks those which didn't appear on either
// side of the dispute until now. So we check the other side
// and checked the first side before.
if other_bits.get(validator.0 as usize).map_or(false, |b| !*b) {
self.new_participants.set(validator.0 as usize, true);
}
Ok(())
}
fn finish(mut self) -> ImportSummary<BlockNumber> {
let pre_flags = self.pre_flags;
let post_flags = DisputeStateFlags::from_state(&self.state);
let pre_post_contains = |flags| (pre_flags.contains(flags), post_flags.contains(flags));
// 1. Act on confirmed flag state to inform spam slots changes.
let spam_slot_changes: Vec<_> = match pre_post_contains(DisputeStateFlags::CONFIRMED) {
(false, false) => {
// increment spam slots for all new participants.
self.new_participants
.iter_ones()
.map(|i| (ValidatorIndex(i as _), SpamSlotChange::Inc))
.collect()
},
(false, true) => {
let prev_participants = {
// all participants
let mut a = self.state.validators_for.clone();
*a |= self.state.validators_against.iter().by_val();
// which are not new participants
*a &= self.new_participants.iter().by_val().map(|b| !b);
a
};
prev_participants
.iter_ones()
.map(|i| (ValidatorIndex(i as _), SpamSlotChange::Dec))
.collect()
},
(true, true) | (true, false) => {
// nothing to do. (true, false) is also impossible.
Vec::new()
},
};
// 2. Check for fresh FOR supermajority. Only if not already concluded.
let slash_against =
if let (false, true) = pre_post_contains(DisputeStateFlags::FOR_SUPERMAJORITY) {
if self.state.concluded_at.is_none() {
self.state.concluded_at = Some(self.now.clone());
}
// provide AGAINST voters to slash.
self.state
.validators_against
.iter_ones()
.map(|i| ValidatorIndex(i as _))
.collect()
} else {
Vec::new()
};
// 3. Check for fresh AGAINST supermajority.
let slash_for =
if let (false, true) = pre_post_contains(DisputeStateFlags::AGAINST_SUPERMAJORITY) {
if self.state.concluded_at.is_none() {
self.state.concluded_at = Some(self.now.clone());
}
// provide FOR voters to slash.
self.state.validators_for.iter_ones().map(|i| ValidatorIndex(i as _)).collect()
} else {
Vec::new()
};
ImportSummary {
state: self.state,
spam_slot_changes,
slash_against,
slash_for,
new_participants: self.new_participants,
new_flags: post_flags - pre_flags,
}
}
}
// A filter on a dispute statement set.
#[derive(PartialEq)]
#[cfg_attr(test, derive(Debug))]
enum StatementSetFilter {
// Remove the entire dispute statement set.
RemoveAll,
// Remove the votes with given index from the statement set.
RemoveIndices(Vec<usize>),
}
impl StatementSetFilter {
fn filter_statement_set(
self,
mut statement_set: DisputeStatementSet,
) -> Option<DisputeStatementSet> {
match self {
StatementSetFilter::RemoveAll => None,
StatementSetFilter::RemoveIndices(mut indices) => {
indices.sort();
indices.dedup();
// reverse order ensures correctness
for index in indices.into_iter().rev() {
// swap_remove guarantees linear complexity.
statement_set.statements.swap_remove(index);
}
if statement_set.statements.is_empty() {
None
} else {
Some(statement_set)
}
},
}
}
fn remove_index(&mut self, i: usize) {
if let StatementSetFilter::RemoveIndices(ref mut indices) = *self {
indices.push(i)
}
}
}
impl<T: Config> Pallet<T> {
/// Called by the initializer to initialize the disputes module.
pub(crate) fn initializer_initialize(now: T::BlockNumber) -> Weight {
let config = <configuration::Pallet<T>>::config();
let mut weight = 0;
for (session_index, candidate_hash, mut dispute) in <Disputes<T>>::iter() {
weight += T::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(1, 0);
if dispute.concluded_at.is_none() &&
dispute.start + config.dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period < now
{
Self::deposit_event(Event::DisputeTimedOut(candidate_hash));
dispute.concluded_at = Some(now);
<Disputes<T>>::insert(session_index, candidate_hash, &dispute);
if <Included<T>>::contains_key(&session_index, &candidate_hash) {
// Local disputes don't count towards spam.
weight += T::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(1, 1);
continue
}
// mildly punish all validators involved. they've failed to make
// data available to others, so this is most likely spam.
SpamSlots::<T>::mutate(session_index, |spam_slots| {
let spam_slots = match spam_slots {
Some(ref mut s) => s,
None => return,
};
// also reduce spam slots for all validators involved, if the dispute was unconfirmed.
// this does open us up to more spam, but only for validators who are willing
// to be punished more.
//
// it would be unexpected for any change here to occur when the dispute has not concluded
// in time, as a dispute guaranteed to have at least one honest participant should
// conclude quickly.
let participating = decrement_spam(spam_slots, &dispute);
// Slight punishment as these validators have failed to make data available to
// others in a timely manner.
T::PunishValidators::punish_inconclusive(
session_index,
participating.iter_ones().map(|i| ValidatorIndex(i as _)),
);
});
weight += T::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(2, 2);
}
}
weight
}
/// Called by the initializer to finalize the disputes module.
pub(crate) fn initializer_finalize() {}
/// Called by the initializer to note a new session in the disputes module.
pub(crate) fn initializer_on_new_session(
notification: &SessionChangeNotification<T::BlockNumber>,
) {
let config = <configuration::Pallet<T>>::config();
if notification.session_index <= config.dispute_period + 1 {
return
}
let pruning_target = notification.session_index - config.dispute_period - 1;
LastPrunedSession::<T>::mutate(|last_pruned| {
let to_prune = if let Some(last_pruned) = last_pruned {
*last_pruned + 1..=pruning_target
} else {
pruning_target..=pruning_target
};
for to_prune in to_prune {
// This should be small, as disputes are rare, so `None` is fine.
<Disputes<T>>::remove_prefix(to_prune, None);
// This is larger, and will be extracted to the `shared` module for more proper pruning.
// TODO: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/3469
<Included<T>>::remove_prefix(to_prune, None);
SpamSlots::<T>::remove(to_prune);
}
*last_pruned = Some(pruning_target);
});
}
/// Handle sets of dispute statements corresponding to 0 or more candidates.
/// Returns a vector of freshly created disputes.
///
/// # Warning
///
/// This functions modifies the state when failing. It is expected to be called in inherent,
/// and to fail the extrinsic on error. As invalid inherents are not allowed, the dirty state
/// is not commited.
pub(crate) fn provide_multi_dispute_data(
statement_sets: MultiDisputeStatementSet,
) -> Result<Vec<(SessionIndex, CandidateHash)>, DispatchError> {
let config = <configuration::Pallet<T>>::config();
// Deduplicate.
{
let mut targets: Vec<_> =
statement_sets.iter().map(|set| (set.candidate_hash.0, set.session)).collect();
targets.sort();
let submitted = targets.len();
targets.dedup();
ensure!(submitted == targets.len(), Error::<T>::DuplicateDisputeStatementSets);
}
let mut fresh = Vec::with_capacity(statement_sets.len());
for statement_set in statement_sets {
let dispute_target = (statement_set.session, statement_set.candidate_hash);
if Self::provide_dispute_data(&config, statement_set)? {
fresh.push(dispute_target);
}
}
Ok(fresh)
}
fn filter_multi_dispute_data(statement_sets: &mut MultiDisputeStatementSet) {
let config = <configuration::Pallet<T>>::config();
let old_statement_sets = sp_std::mem::take(statement_sets);
// Deduplicate.
let dedup_iter = {
let mut targets = BTreeSet::new();
old_statement_sets.into_iter().filter(move |set| {
let target = (set.candidate_hash, set.session);
targets.insert(target)
})
};
*statement_sets = dedup_iter
.filter_map(|set| {
let filter = Self::filter_dispute_data(&config, &set);
filter.filter_statement_set(set)
})
.collect();
}
// Given a statement set, this produces a filter to be applied to the statement set.
// It either removes the entire dispute statement set or some specific votes from it.
//
// Votes which are duplicate or already known by the chain are filtered out.
// The entire set is removed if the dispute is ancient or concluded.
fn filter_dispute_data(
config: &HostConfiguration<T::BlockNumber>,
set: &DisputeStatementSet,
) -> StatementSetFilter {
let mut filter = StatementSetFilter::RemoveIndices(Vec::new());
// Dispute statement sets on any dispute which concluded
// before this point are to be rejected.
let now = <frame_system::Pallet<T>>::block_number();
let oldest_accepted = now.saturating_sub(config.dispute_post_conclusion_acceptance_period);
// Load session info to access validators
let session_info = match <session_info::Pallet<T>>::session_info(set.session) {
Some(s) => s,
None => return StatementSetFilter::RemoveAll,
};
let n_validators = session_info.validators.len();
// Check for ancient.
let dispute_state = {
if let Some(dispute_state) = <Disputes<T>>::get(&set.session, &set.candidate_hash) {
if dispute_state.concluded_at.as_ref().map_or(false, |c| c < &oldest_accepted) {
return StatementSetFilter::RemoveAll
}
dispute_state
} else {
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; n_validators],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; n_validators],
start: now,
concluded_at: None,
}
}
};
// Check and import all votes.
let summary = {
let mut importer = DisputeStateImporter::new(dispute_state, now);
for (i, (statement, validator_index, signature)) in set.statements.iter().enumerate() {
let validator_public = match session_info.validators.get(validator_index.0 as usize)
{
None => {
filter.remove_index(i);
continue
},
Some(v) => v,
};
let valid = statement.indicates_validity();
if let Err(_) = importer.import(*validator_index, valid) {
filter.remove_index(i);
continue
}
// Check signature after attempting import.
//
// Since we expect that this filter will be applied to
// disputes long after they're concluded, 99% of the time,
// the duplicate filter above will catch them before needing
// to do a heavy signature check.
//
// This is only really important until the post-conclusion acceptance threshold
// is reached, and then no part of this loop will be hit.
if let Err(()) = check_signature(
&validator_public,
set.candidate_hash,
set.session,
statement,
signature,
) {
filter.remove_index(i);
continue
}
}
importer.finish()
};
// Apply spam slot changes. Bail early if too many occupied.
let is_local = <Included<T>>::contains_key(&set.session, &set.candidate_hash);
if !is_local {
let mut spam_slots: Vec<u32> =
SpamSlots::<T>::get(&set.session).unwrap_or_else(|| vec![0; n_validators]);
for (validator_index, spam_slot_change) in summary.spam_slot_changes {
let spam_slot = spam_slots
.get_mut(validator_index.0 as usize)
.expect("index is in-bounds, as checked above; qed");
if let SpamSlotChange::Inc = spam_slot_change {
if *spam_slot >= config.dispute_max_spam_slots {
// Find the vote by this validator and filter it out.
let first_index_in_set = set
.statements
.iter()
.position(|(_, v_i, _)| &validator_index == v_i)
.expect(
"spam slots are only incremented when a new statement \
from a validator is included; qed",
);
// Note that there may be many votes by the validator in the statement
// set. There are not supposed to be, but the purpose of this function
// is to filter out invalid submissions, after all.
//
// This is fine - we only need to handle the first one, because all
// subsequent votes' indices have been added to the filter already
// by the duplicate checks above. It's only the first one which
// may not already have been filtered out.
filter.remove_index(first_index_in_set);
}
// It's also worth noting that the `DisputeStateImporter`
// which produces these spam slot updates only produces
// one spam slot update per validator because it rejects
// duplicate votes.
//
// So we don't need to worry about spam slots being
// updated incorrectly after receiving duplicates.
*spam_slot += 1;
} else {
*spam_slot = spam_slot.saturating_sub(1);
}
}
// We write the spam slots here because sequential calls to
// `filter_dispute_data` have a dependency on each other.
//
// For example, if a validator V occupies 1 spam slot and
// max is 2, then 2 sequential calls incrementing spam slot
// cannot be allowed.
//
// However, 3 sequential calls, where the first increments,
// the second decrements, and the third increments would be allowed.
SpamSlots::<T>::insert(&set.session, spam_slots);
}
filter
}
/// Handle a set of dispute statements corresponding to a single candidate.
///
/// Fails if the dispute data is invalid. Returns a boolean indicating whether the
/// dispute is fresh.
fn provide_dispute_data(
config: &HostConfiguration<T::BlockNumber>,
set: DisputeStatementSet,
) -> Result<bool, DispatchError> {
// Dispute statement sets on any dispute which concluded
// before this point are to be rejected.
let now = <frame_system::Pallet<T>>::block_number();
let oldest_accepted = now.saturating_sub(config.dispute_post_conclusion_acceptance_period);
// Load session info to access validators
let session_info = match <session_info::Pallet<T>>::session_info(set.session) {
Some(s) => s,
None => return Err(Error::<T>::AncientDisputeStatement.into()),
};
let n_validators = session_info.validators.len();
// Check for ancient.
let (fresh, dispute_state) = {
if let Some(dispute_state) = <Disputes<T>>::get(&set.session, &set.candidate_hash) {
ensure!(
dispute_state.concluded_at.as_ref().map_or(true, |c| c >= &oldest_accepted),
Error::<T>::AncientDisputeStatement,
);
(false, dispute_state)
} else {
(
true,
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; n_validators],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; n_validators],
start: now,
concluded_at: None,
},
)
}
};
// Check and import all votes.
let summary = {
let mut importer = DisputeStateImporter::new(dispute_state, now);
for (statement, validator_index, signature) in &set.statements {
let validator_public = session_info
.validators
.get(validator_index.0 as usize)
.ok_or(Error::<T>::ValidatorIndexOutOfBounds)?;
// Check signature before importing.
check_signature(
&validator_public,
set.candidate_hash,
set.session,
statement,
signature,
)
.map_err(|()| Error::<T>::InvalidSignature)?;
let valid = statement.indicates_validity();
importer.import(*validator_index, valid).map_err(Error::<T>::from)?;
}
importer.finish()
};
// Apply spam slot changes. Bail early if too many occupied.
let is_local = <Included<T>>::contains_key(&set.session, &set.candidate_hash);
if !is_local {
let mut spam_slots: Vec<u32> =
SpamSlots::<T>::get(&set.session).unwrap_or_else(|| vec![0; n_validators]);
for (validator_index, spam_slot_change) in summary.spam_slot_changes {
let spam_slot = spam_slots
.get_mut(validator_index.0 as usize)
.expect("index is in-bounds, as checked above; qed");
match spam_slot_change {
SpamSlotChange::Inc => {
ensure!(
*spam_slot < config.dispute_max_spam_slots,
Error::<T>::PotentialSpam,
);
*spam_slot += 1;
},
SpamSlotChange::Dec => {
*spam_slot = spam_slot.saturating_sub(1);
},
}
}
SpamSlots::<T>::insert(&set.session, spam_slots);
}
if fresh {
Self::deposit_event(Event::DisputeInitiated(
set.candidate_hash,
if is_local { DisputeLocation::Local } else { DisputeLocation::Remote },
));
}
{
if summary.new_flags.contains(DisputeStateFlags::FOR_SUPERMAJORITY) {
Self::deposit_event(Event::DisputeConcluded(
set.candidate_hash,
DisputeResult::Valid,
));
}
// It is possible, although unexpected, for a dispute to conclude twice.
// This would require f+1 validators to vote in both directions.
// A dispute cannot conclude more than once in each direction.
if summary.new_flags.contains(DisputeStateFlags::AGAINST_SUPERMAJORITY) {
Self::deposit_event(Event::DisputeConcluded(
set.candidate_hash,
DisputeResult::Invalid,
));
}
}
// Reward statements.
T::RewardValidators::reward_dispute_statement(
set.session,
summary.new_participants.iter_ones().map(|i| ValidatorIndex(i as _)),
);
// Slash participants on a losing side.
{
// a valid candidate, according to 2/3. Punish those on the 'against' side.
T::PunishValidators::punish_against_valid(set.session, summary.slash_against);
// an invalid candidate, according to 2/3. Punish those on the 'for' side.
T::PunishValidators::punish_for_invalid(set.session, summary.slash_for);
}
<Disputes<T>>::insert(&set.session, &set.candidate_hash, &summary.state);
// Freeze if just concluded against some local candidate
if summary.new_flags.contains(DisputeStateFlags::AGAINST_SUPERMAJORITY) {
if let Some(revert_to) = <Included<T>>::get(&set.session, &set.candidate_hash) {
Self::revert_and_freeze(revert_to);
}
}
Ok(fresh)
}
#[allow(unused)]
pub(crate) fn disputes() -> Vec<(SessionIndex, CandidateHash, DisputeState<T::BlockNumber>)> {
<Disputes<T>>::iter().collect()
}
pub(crate) fn note_included(
session: SessionIndex,
candidate_hash: CandidateHash,
included_in: T::BlockNumber,
) {
if included_in.is_zero() {
return
}
let revert_to = included_in - One::one();
<Included<T>>::insert(&session, &candidate_hash, revert_to);
// If we just included a block locally which has a live dispute, decrement spam slots
// for any involved validators, if the dispute is not already confirmed by f + 1.
if let Some(state) = <Disputes<T>>::get(&session, candidate_hash) {
SpamSlots::<T>::mutate(&session, |spam_slots| {
if let Some(ref mut spam_slots) = *spam_slots {
decrement_spam(spam_slots, &state);
}
});
if has_supermajority_against(&state) {
Self::revert_and_freeze(revert_to);
}
}
}
pub(crate) fn could_be_invalid(session: SessionIndex, candidate_hash: CandidateHash) -> bool {
<Disputes<T>>::get(&session, &candidate_hash).map_or(false, |dispute| {
// A dispute that is ongoing or has concluded with supermajority-against.
dispute.concluded_at.is_none() || has_supermajority_against(&dispute)
})
}
pub(crate) fn is_frozen() -> bool {
Self::last_valid_block().is_some()
}
pub(crate) fn revert_and_freeze(revert_to: T::BlockNumber) {
if Self::last_valid_block().map_or(true, |last| last > revert_to) {
Frozen::<T>::set(Some(revert_to));
Self::deposit_event(Event::Revert(revert_to));
frame_system::Pallet::<T>::deposit_log(
ConsensusLog::Revert(revert_to.saturated_into()).into(),
);
}
}
}
fn has_supermajority_against<BlockNumber>(dispute: &DisputeState<BlockNumber>) -> bool {
let supermajority_threshold = supermajority_threshold(dispute.validators_against.len());
dispute.validators_against.count_ones() >= supermajority_threshold
}
// If the dispute had not enough validators to confirm, decrement spam slots for all the participating
// validators.
//
// Returns the set of participating validators as a bitvec.
fn decrement_spam<BlockNumber>(
spam_slots: &mut [u32],
dispute: &DisputeState<BlockNumber>,
) -> bitvec::vec::BitVec<BitOrderLsb0, u8> {
let byzantine_threshold = byzantine_threshold(spam_slots.len());
let participating = dispute.validators_for.clone() | dispute.validators_against.iter().by_val();
let decrement_spam = participating.count_ones() <= byzantine_threshold;
for validator_index in participating.iter_ones() {
if decrement_spam {
if let Some(occupied) = spam_slots.get_mut(validator_index as usize) {
*occupied = occupied.saturating_sub(1);
}
}
}
participating
}
fn check_signature(
validator_public: &ValidatorId,
candidate_hash: CandidateHash,
session: SessionIndex,
statement: &DisputeStatement,
validator_signature: &ValidatorSignature,
) -> Result<(), ()> {
let payload = match *statement {
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit) =>
ExplicitDisputeStatement { valid: true, candidate_hash, session }.signing_payload(),
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::BackingSeconded(inclusion_parent)) =>
CompactStatement::Seconded(candidate_hash).signing_payload(&SigningContext {
session_index: session,
parent_hash: inclusion_parent,
}),
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::BackingValid(inclusion_parent)) =>
CompactStatement::Valid(candidate_hash).signing_payload(&SigningContext {
session_index: session,
parent_hash: inclusion_parent,
}),
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::ApprovalChecking) =>
ApprovalVote(candidate_hash).signing_payload(session),
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit) =>
ExplicitDisputeStatement { valid: false, candidate_hash, session }.signing_payload(),
};
if validator_signature.verify(&payload[..], &validator_public) {
Ok(())
} else {
Err(())
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
use crate::mock::{
new_test_ext, AccountId, AllPallets, Initializer, MockGenesisConfig, System, Test,
PUNISH_VALIDATORS_AGAINST, PUNISH_VALIDATORS_FOR, PUNISH_VALIDATORS_INCONCLUSIVE,
REWARD_VALIDATORS,
};
use frame_support::{
assert_err, assert_noop, assert_ok,
traits::{OnFinalize, OnInitialize},
};
use frame_system::InitKind;
use primitives::v1::BlockNumber;
use sp_core::{crypto::CryptoType, Pair};
// All arguments for `initializer::on_new_session`
type NewSession<'a> = (
bool,
SessionIndex,
Vec<(&'a AccountId, ValidatorId)>,
Option<Vec<(&'a AccountId, ValidatorId)>>,
);
// Run to specific block, while calling disputes pallet hooks manually, because disputes is not
// integrated in initializer yet.
fn run_to_block<'a>(
to: BlockNumber,
new_session: impl Fn(BlockNumber) -> Option<NewSession<'a>>,
) {
while System::block_number() < to {
let b = System::block_number();
if b != 0 {
AllPallets::on_finalize(b);
System::finalize();
}
System::initialize(&(b + 1), &Default::default(), &Default::default(), InitKind::Full);
AllPallets::on_initialize(b + 1);
if let Some(new_session) = new_session(b + 1) {
Initializer::test_trigger_on_new_session(
new_session.0,
new_session.1,
new_session.2.into_iter(),
new_session.3.map(|q| q.into_iter()),
);
}
}
}
#[test]
fn test_dispute_state_flag_from_state() {
assert_eq!(
DisputeStateFlags::from_state(&DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
}),
DisputeStateFlags::default(),
);
assert_eq!(
DisputeStateFlags::from_state(&DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
}),
DisputeStateFlags::FOR_SUPERMAJORITY | DisputeStateFlags::CONFIRMED,
);
assert_eq!(
DisputeStateFlags::from_state(&DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
}),
DisputeStateFlags::AGAINST_SUPERMAJORITY | DisputeStateFlags::CONFIRMED,
);
}
#[test]
fn test_import_new_participant_spam_inc() {
let mut importer = DisputeStateImporter::new(
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
},
0,
);
assert_err!(
importer.import(ValidatorIndex(9), true),
VoteImportError::ValidatorIndexOutOfBounds,
);
assert_err!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(0), true), VoteImportError::DuplicateStatement,);
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(0), false));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(2), true));
assert_err!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(2), true), VoteImportError::DuplicateStatement,);
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(2), false));
assert_err!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(2), false), VoteImportError::DuplicateStatement,);
let summary = importer.finish();
assert_eq!(summary.new_flags, DisputeStateFlags::default());
assert_eq!(
summary.state,
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
},
);
assert_eq!(summary.spam_slot_changes, vec![(ValidatorIndex(2), SpamSlotChange::Inc)],);
assert!(summary.slash_for.is_empty());
assert!(summary.slash_against.is_empty());
assert_eq!(summary.new_participants, bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]);
}
#[test]
fn test_import_prev_participant_spam_dec_confirmed() {
let mut importer = DisputeStateImporter::new(
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
},
0,
);
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(2), true));
let summary = importer.finish();
assert_eq!(
summary.state,
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
},
);
assert_eq!(
summary.spam_slot_changes,
vec![
(ValidatorIndex(0), SpamSlotChange::Dec),
(ValidatorIndex(1), SpamSlotChange::Dec),
],
);
assert!(summary.slash_for.is_empty());
assert!(summary.slash_against.is_empty());
assert_eq!(summary.new_participants, bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]);
assert_eq!(summary.new_flags, DisputeStateFlags::CONFIRMED);
}
#[test]
fn test_import_prev_participant_spam_dec_confirmed_slash_for() {
let mut importer = DisputeStateImporter::new(
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
},
0,
);
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(2), true));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(2), false));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(3), false));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(4), false));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(5), false));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(6), false));
let summary = importer.finish();
assert_eq!(
summary.state,
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: Some(0),
},
);
assert_eq!(
summary.spam_slot_changes,
vec![
(ValidatorIndex(0), SpamSlotChange::Dec),
(ValidatorIndex(1), SpamSlotChange::Dec),
],
);
assert_eq!(summary.slash_for, vec![ValidatorIndex(0), ValidatorIndex(2)]);
assert!(summary.slash_against.is_empty());
assert_eq!(summary.new_participants, bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]);
assert_eq!(
summary.new_flags,
DisputeStateFlags::CONFIRMED | DisputeStateFlags::AGAINST_SUPERMAJORITY,
);
}
#[test]
fn test_import_slash_against() {
let mut importer = DisputeStateImporter::new(
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
},
0,
);
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(3), true));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(4), true));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(5), false));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(6), true));
assert_ok!(importer.import(ValidatorIndex(7), true));
let summary = importer.finish();
assert_eq!(
summary.state,
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: Some(0),
},
);
assert!(summary.spam_slot_changes.is_empty());
assert!(summary.slash_for.is_empty());
assert_eq!(summary.slash_against, vec![ValidatorIndex(1), ValidatorIndex(5)]);
assert_eq!(summary.new_participants, bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]);
assert_eq!(summary.new_flags, DisputeStateFlags::FOR_SUPERMAJORITY);
}
// Test that punish_inconclusive is correctly called.
#[test]
fn test_initializer_initialize() {
let dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period = 3;
let start = 10;
let mock_genesis_config = MockGenesisConfig {
configuration: crate::configuration::GenesisConfig {
config: HostConfiguration {
dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period,
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
};
new_test_ext(mock_genesis_config).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v1 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v2 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v3 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
// NOTE: v0 index will be 0
// NOTE: v1 index will be 3
// NOTE: v2 index will be 2
// NOTE: v3 index will be 1
run_to_block(start, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((
true,
b,
vec![
(&0, v0.public()),
(&1, v1.public()),
(&2, v2.public()),
(&3, v3.public()),
],
Some(vec![
(&0, v0.public()),
(&1, v1.public()),
(&2, v2.public()),
(&3, v3.public()),
]),
))
});
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
// v0 votes for 3
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: start - 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
v0.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: start - 1,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
}];
assert_ok!(
Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts),
vec![(9, candidate_hash.clone())],
);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(start - 1), Some(vec![1, 0, 0, 0]));
// Run to timeout period
run_to_block(start + dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period, |_| None);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(start - 1), Some(vec![1, 0, 0, 0]));
// Run to timeout + 1 in order to executive on_finalize(timeout)
run_to_block(start + dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period + 1, |_| None);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(start - 1), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
assert_eq!(
PUNISH_VALIDATORS_INCONCLUSIVE.with(|r| r.borrow()[0].clone()),
(9, vec![ValidatorIndex(0)]),
);
});
}
// Test prunning works
#[test]
fn test_initializer_on_new_session() {
let dispute_period = 3;
let mock_genesis_config = MockGenesisConfig {
configuration: crate::configuration::GenesisConfig {
config: HostConfiguration { dispute_period, ..Default::default() },
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
};
new_test_ext(mock_genesis_config).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(0, candidate_hash.clone(), 0);
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(1, candidate_hash.clone(), 1);
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(2, candidate_hash.clone(), 2);
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(3, candidate_hash.clone(), 3);
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(4, candidate_hash.clone(), 4);
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(5, candidate_hash.clone(), 5);
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(6, candidate_hash.clone(), 5);
run_to_block(7, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((true, b, vec![(&0, v0.public())], Some(vec![(&0, v0.public())])))
});
// current session is 7,
// we keep for dispute_period + 1 session and we remove in on_finalize
// thus we keep info for session 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
assert_eq!(Included::<Test>::iter_prefix(0).count(), 0);
assert_eq!(Included::<Test>::iter_prefix(1).count(), 0);
assert_eq!(Included::<Test>::iter_prefix(2).count(), 0);
assert_eq!(Included::<Test>::iter_prefix(3).count(), 1);
assert_eq!(Included::<Test>::iter_prefix(4).count(), 1);
assert_eq!(Included::<Test>::iter_prefix(5).count(), 1);
assert_eq!(Included::<Test>::iter_prefix(6).count(), 1);
});
}
#[test]
fn test_provide_multi_dispute_data_duplicate_error() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
let candidate_hash_1 = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let candidate_hash_2 = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(2));
let stmts = vec![
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_2,
session: 2,
statements: vec![],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_1,
session: 1,
statements: vec![],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_2,
session: 2,
statements: vec![],
},
];
assert_err!(
Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts),
DispatchError::from(Error::<Test>::DuplicateDisputeStatementSets),
);
})
}
// Test:
// * wrong signature fails
// * signature is checked for correct validator
#[test]
fn test_provide_multi_dispute_is_checking_signature_correctly() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v1 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(3, |b| {
// a new session at each block
if b == 1 {
Some((true, b, vec![(&0, v0.public())], Some(vec![(&0, v0.public())])))
} else {
Some((true, b, vec![(&1, v1.public())], Some(vec![(&1, v1.public())])))
}
});
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
v0.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
}];
assert_ok!(
Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts),
vec![(1, candidate_hash.clone())],
);
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 2,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
v0.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 2,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
}];
assert_noop!(
Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts),
DispatchError::from(Error::<Test>::InvalidSignature),
);
})
}
#[test]
fn test_freeze_on_note_included() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(6, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((true, b, vec![(&0, v0.public())], Some(vec![(&0, v0.public())])))
});
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
// v0 votes for 3
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
v0.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: false,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
}];
assert!(Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts).is_ok());
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(3, candidate_hash.clone(), 3);
assert_eq!(Frozen::<Test>::get(), Some(2));
});
}
#[test]
fn test_freeze_provided_against_supermajority_for_included() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(6, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((true, b, vec![(&0, v0.public())], Some(vec![(&0, v0.public())])))
});
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(3, candidate_hash.clone(), 3);
// v0 votes for 3
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
v0.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: false,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
}];
assert!(Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts).is_ok());
assert_eq!(Frozen::<Test>::get(), Some(2));
});
}
// tests for:
// * provide_multi_dispute: with success scenario
// * disputes: correctness of datas
// * could_be_invalid: correctness of datas
// * note_included: decrement spam correctly
// * spam slots: correctly incremented and decremented
// * ensure rewards and punishment are correctly called.
#[test]
fn test_provide_multi_dispute_success_and_other() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v1 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v2 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v3 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
// NOTE: v0 index will be 0
// NOTE: v1 index will be 3
// NOTE: v2 index will be 2
// NOTE: v3 index will be 1
run_to_block(6, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((
true,
b,
vec![
(&0, v0.public()),
(&1, v1.public()),
(&2, v2.public()),
(&3, v3.public()),
],
Some(vec![
(&0, v0.public()),
(&1, v1.public()),
(&2, v2.public()),
(&3, v3.public()),
]),
))
});
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
// v0 votes for 3
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
v0.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
}];
assert_ok!(
Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts),
vec![(3, candidate_hash.clone())],
);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(3), Some(vec![1, 0, 0, 0]));
// v1 votes for 4 and for 3
let stmts = vec![
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 4,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(3),
v1.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 4,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(3),
v1.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
},
];
assert_ok!(
Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts),
vec![(4, candidate_hash.clone())],
);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(3), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0])); // Confirmed as no longer spam
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(4), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 1]));
// v3 votes against 3 and for 5
let stmts = vec![
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(1),
v3.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: false,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 5,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(1),
v3.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 5,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
},
];
assert_ok!(
Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts),
vec![(5, candidate_hash.clone())],
);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(3), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(4), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 1]));
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(5), Some(vec![0, 1, 0, 0]));
// v2 votes for 3 and againt 5
let stmts = vec![
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(2),
v2.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 3,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 5,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(2),
v2.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: false,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 5,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
},
];
assert_ok!(Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts), vec![]);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(3), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(4), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 1]));
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(5), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
// v0 votes for 5
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 5,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
v0.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: false,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 5,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
}];
assert_ok!(Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts), vec![]);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(3), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(4), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 1]));
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(5), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
// v1 votes for 5
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 5,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(3),
v1.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: false,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 5,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
)],
}];
assert_ok!(Pallet::<Test>::provide_multi_dispute_data(stmts), vec![],);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(3), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(4), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 1]));
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(5), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
assert_eq!(
Pallet::<Test>::disputes(),
vec![
(
5,
candidate_hash.clone(),
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 1, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 1],
start: 6,
concluded_at: Some(6), // 3 vote against
}
),
(
3,
candidate_hash.clone(),
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 1],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 1, 0, 0],
start: 6,
concluded_at: Some(6), // 3 vote for
}
),
(
4,
candidate_hash.clone(),
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 0, 1],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 6,
concluded_at: None,
}
),
]
);
assert_eq!(Pallet::<Test>::could_be_invalid(3, candidate_hash.clone()), false); // It has 3 votes for
assert_eq!(Pallet::<Test>::could_be_invalid(4, candidate_hash.clone()), true);
assert_eq!(Pallet::<Test>::could_be_invalid(5, candidate_hash.clone()), true);
// Ensure inclusion removes spam slots
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(4), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 1]));
Pallet::<Test>::note_included(4, candidate_hash.clone(), 4);
assert_eq!(SpamSlots::<Test>::get(4), Some(vec![0, 0, 0, 0]));
// Ensure the reward_validator function was correctly called
assert_eq!(
REWARD_VALIDATORS.with(|r| r.borrow().clone()),
vec![
(3, vec![ValidatorIndex(0)]),
(4, vec![ValidatorIndex(3)]),
(3, vec![ValidatorIndex(3)]),
(3, vec![ValidatorIndex(1)]),
(5, vec![ValidatorIndex(1)]),
(3, vec![ValidatorIndex(2)]),
(5, vec![ValidatorIndex(2)]),
(5, vec![ValidatorIndex(0)]),
(5, vec![ValidatorIndex(3)]),
],
);
// Ensure punishment against is called
assert_eq!(
PUNISH_VALIDATORS_AGAINST.with(|r| r.borrow().clone()),
vec![
(3, vec![]),
(4, vec![]),
(3, vec![]),
(3, vec![]),
(5, vec![]),
(3, vec![ValidatorIndex(1)]),
(5, vec![]),
(5, vec![]),
(5, vec![]),
],
);
// Ensure punishment for is called
assert_eq!(
PUNISH_VALIDATORS_FOR.with(|r| r.borrow().clone()),
vec![
(3, vec![]),
(4, vec![]),
(3, vec![]),
(3, vec![]),
(5, vec![]),
(3, vec![]),
(5, vec![]),
(5, vec![]),
(5, vec![ValidatorIndex(1)]),
],
);
})
}
#[test]
fn test_revert_and_freeze() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
// events are ignored for genesis block
System::set_block_number(1);
Frozen::<Test>::put(Some(0));
assert_noop!(
{
Pallet::<Test>::revert_and_freeze(0);
Result::<(), ()>::Err(()) // Just a small trick in order to use assert_noop.
},
(),
);
Frozen::<Test>::kill();
Pallet::<Test>::revert_and_freeze(0);
assert_eq!(Frozen::<Test>::get(), Some(0));
assert_eq!(System::digest().logs[0], ConsensusLog::Revert(0).into());
System::assert_has_event(Event::Revert(0).into());
})
}
#[test]
fn test_revert_and_freeze_merges() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
Frozen::<Test>::put(Some(10));
assert_noop!(
{
Pallet::<Test>::revert_and_freeze(10);
Result::<(), ()>::Err(()) // Just a small trick in order to use assert_noop.
},
(),
);
Pallet::<Test>::revert_and_freeze(8);
assert_eq!(Frozen::<Test>::get(), Some(8));
})
}
#[test]
fn test_has_supermajority_against() {
assert_eq!(
has_supermajority_against(&DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
}),
false,
);
assert_eq!(
has_supermajority_against(&DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
}),
true,
);
}
#[test]
fn test_decrement_spam() {
let original_spam_slots = vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7];
// Test confirm is no-op
let mut spam_slots = original_spam_slots.clone();
let dispute_state_confirm = DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
};
assert_eq!(
DisputeStateFlags::from_state(&dispute_state_confirm),
DisputeStateFlags::CONFIRMED
);
assert_eq!(
decrement_spam(spam_slots.as_mut(), &dispute_state_confirm),
bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
);
assert_eq!(spam_slots, original_spam_slots);
// Test not confirm is decreasing spam
let mut spam_slots = original_spam_slots.clone();
let dispute_state_no_confirm = DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
start: 0,
concluded_at: None,
};
assert_eq!(
DisputeStateFlags::from_state(&dispute_state_no_confirm),
DisputeStateFlags::default()
);
assert_eq!(
decrement_spam(spam_slots.as_mut(), &dispute_state_no_confirm),
bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
);
assert_eq!(spam_slots, vec![0, 1, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]);
}
#[test]
fn test_check_signature() {
let validator_id = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let wrong_validator_id = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let session = 0;
let wrong_session = 1;
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let wrong_candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(2));
let inclusion_parent = sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(3);
let wrong_inclusion_parent = sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(4);
let statement_1 = DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit);
let statement_2 = DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::BackingSeconded(
inclusion_parent.clone(),
));
let wrong_statement_2 = DisputeStatement::Valid(
ValidDisputeStatementKind::BackingSeconded(wrong_inclusion_parent.clone()),
);
let statement_3 = DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::BackingValid(
inclusion_parent.clone(),
));
let wrong_statement_3 = DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::BackingValid(
wrong_inclusion_parent.clone(),
));
let statement_4 = DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::ApprovalChecking);
let statement_5 = DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit);
let signed_1 = validator_id.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session,
}
.signing_payload(),
);
let signed_2 =
validator_id.sign(&CompactStatement::Seconded(candidate_hash.clone()).signing_payload(
&SigningContext { session_index: session, parent_hash: inclusion_parent.clone() },
));
let signed_3 =
validator_id.sign(&CompactStatement::Valid(candidate_hash.clone()).signing_payload(
&SigningContext { session_index: session, parent_hash: inclusion_parent.clone() },
));
let signed_4 =
validator_id.sign(&ApprovalVote(candidate_hash.clone()).signing_payload(session));
let signed_5 = validator_id.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: false,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session,
}
.signing_payload(),
);
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_1,
&signed_1
)
.is_ok());
assert!(check_signature(
&wrong_validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_1,
&signed_1
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
wrong_candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_1,
&signed_1
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
wrong_session,
&statement_1,
&signed_1
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_2,
&signed_1
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_3,
&signed_1
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_4,
&signed_1
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_5,
&signed_1
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_2,
&signed_2
)
.is_ok());
assert!(check_signature(
&wrong_validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_2,
&signed_2
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
wrong_candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_2,
&signed_2
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
wrong_session,
&statement_2,
&signed_2
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&wrong_statement_2,
&signed_2
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_1,
&signed_2
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_3,
&signed_2
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_4,
&signed_2
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_5,
&signed_2
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_3,
&signed_3
)
.is_ok());
assert!(check_signature(
&wrong_validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_3,
&signed_3
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
wrong_candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_3,
&signed_3
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
wrong_session,
&statement_3,
&signed_3
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&wrong_statement_3,
&signed_3
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_1,
&signed_3
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_2,
&signed_3
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_4,
&signed_3
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_5,
&signed_3
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_4,
&signed_4
)
.is_ok());
assert!(check_signature(
&wrong_validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_4,
&signed_4
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
wrong_candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_4,
&signed_4
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
wrong_session,
&statement_4,
&signed_4
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_1,
&signed_4
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_2,
&signed_4
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_3,
&signed_4
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_5,
&signed_4
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_5,
&signed_5
)
.is_ok());
assert!(check_signature(
&wrong_validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_5,
&signed_5
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
wrong_candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_5,
&signed_5
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
wrong_session,
&statement_5,
&signed_5
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_1,
&signed_5
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_2,
&signed_5
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_3,
&signed_5
)
.is_err());
assert!(check_signature(
&validator_id.public(),
candidate_hash,
session,
&statement_4,
&signed_5
)
.is_err());
}
#[test]
fn filter_removes_duplicates_within_set() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(3, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((true, b, vec![(&0, v0.public())], Some(vec![(&0, v0.public())])))
});
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let payload = ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload();
let sig_a = v0.sign(&payload);
let sig_b = v0.sign(&payload);
let sig_c = v0.sign(&payload);
let mut statements = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![
(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_a.clone(),
),
(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_b,
),
(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_c,
),
],
}];
Pallet::<Test>::filter_multi_dispute_data(&mut statements);
assert_eq!(
statements,
vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_a,
),]
}]
)
})
}
#[test]
fn filter_correctly_accounts_spam_slots() {
let dispute_max_spam_slots = 2;
let mock_genesis_config = MockGenesisConfig {
configuration: crate::configuration::GenesisConfig {
config: HostConfiguration { dispute_max_spam_slots, ..Default::default() },
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
};
new_test_ext(mock_genesis_config).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v1 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v2 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v3 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(3, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((
true,
b,
vec![
(&0, v0.public()),
(&1, v1.public()),
(&2, v2.public()),
(&3, v3.public()),
],
Some(vec![
(&0, v0.public()),
(&1, v1.public()),
(&2, v2.public()),
(&3, v3.public()),
]),
))
});
let candidate_hash_a = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let candidate_hash_b = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(2));
let candidate_hash_c = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(3));
let payload_a = ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_a.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload();
let payload_b = ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_b.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload();
let payload_c = ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_c.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload();
let sig_0a = v0.sign(&payload_a);
let sig_0b = v0.sign(&payload_b);
let sig_0c = v0.sign(&payload_c);
let sig_1b = v1.sign(&payload_b);
let mut statements = vec![
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_a.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_0a.clone(),
)],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_b.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![
(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_0b.clone(),
),
(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(3),
sig_1b.clone(),
),
],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_c.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_0c.clone(),
)],
},
];
let old_statements = statements.clone();
Pallet::<Test>::filter_multi_dispute_data(&mut statements);
assert_eq!(statements, old_statements);
})
}
#[test]
fn filter_removes_session_out_of_bounds() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(3, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((true, b, vec![(&0, v0.public())], Some(vec![(&0, v0.public())])))
});
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let payload = ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload();
let sig_a = v0.sign(&payload);
let mut statements = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: 100,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_a,
)],
}];
Pallet::<Test>::filter_multi_dispute_data(&mut statements);
assert!(statements.is_empty());
})
}
#[test]
fn filter_removes_concluded_ancient() {
let dispute_post_conclusion_acceptance_period = 2;
let mock_genesis_config = MockGenesisConfig {
configuration: crate::configuration::GenesisConfig {
config: HostConfiguration {
dispute_post_conclusion_acceptance_period,
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
};
new_test_ext(mock_genesis_config).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(3, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((true, b, vec![(&0, v0.public())], Some(vec![(&0, v0.public())])))
});
let candidate_hash_a = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let candidate_hash_b = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(2));
<Disputes<Test>>::insert(
&1,
&candidate_hash_a,
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; 4],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; 4],
start: 0,
concluded_at: Some(0),
},
);
<Disputes<Test>>::insert(
&1,
&candidate_hash_b,
DisputeState {
validators_for: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; 4],
validators_against: bitvec![BitOrderLsb0, u8; 0; 4],
start: 0,
concluded_at: Some(1),
},
);
let payload_a = ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_a.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload();
let payload_b = ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_b.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload();
let sig_a = v0.sign(&payload_a);
let sig_b = v0.sign(&payload_b);
let mut statements = vec![
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_a.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_a,
)],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_b.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_b.clone(),
)],
},
];
Pallet::<Test>::filter_multi_dispute_data(&mut statements);
assert_eq!(
statements,
vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_b.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_b,
),]
}]
);
})
}
#[test]
fn filter_removes_duplicate_statements_sets() {
new_test_ext(Default::default()).execute_with(|| {
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(3, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((true, b, vec![(&0, v0.public())], Some(vec![(&0, v0.public())])))
});
let candidate_hash_a = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let payload = ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_a.clone(),
session: 1,
}
.signing_payload();
let sig_a = v0.sign(&payload);
let sig_b = v0.sign(&payload);
let mut statements = vec![
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_a.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_a.clone(),
)],
},
DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_a.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_b.clone(),
)],
},
];
Pallet::<Test>::filter_multi_dispute_data(&mut statements);
assert_eq!(
statements,
vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash_a.clone(),
session: 1,
statements: vec![(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(0),
sig_a,
),]
}]
);
})
}
}